Page 367 - Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs
P. 367

CHAPTER TWELVE




              Fracturing fluid flow back




              Abstract
                 In this chapter, the flow back and production performance from common shale
                 reservoirs and experimental results are summarized. Mechanisms of low flow back
                 are proposed. The effects of shut-in, initial rock wettability, invasion depth and surfac-
                 tant additives on flow back are discussed. Finally, some solutions to deal with flow back
                 are summarized.

              Keywords: Delay; Flow back; Invasion; Invasion depth; Permeability recovery; Shut in;
              Surfactant additives; Water blockage.



                   12.1 Introduction
                   After hydraulic fracturing, a well can be put in production immedi-
              ately or after some time. Several terms have been used anonymously to
              describe the time to defer well production: soak, shut-in, resting, and delay.
              Strictly speaking, shut-in or resting means a time lapse between two flowing
              periods, while the delay means the time before the first flowing period. We
              try to explicitly use the different terms of “shut in” and “delay.” The shut-in
              is sometimes called the first shut-in which is from the end of fracturing stim-
              ulation to the start of the first fluid flow back. The shut-in after the first flow
              back is the second shut-in or subsequent shut-in, which is an intentional or
              unintentional event in operation.
                 Generally, fracturing treatments are designed with good fluid stability
              during the pump time. It is desired to break the fluid as quickly and
              completely as possible to facilitate rapid cleanup of the well and minimize
              conductivity damage. It is commonly believed that if the shut-in in the
              reservoir is too long, fracture conductivity damage may increase. For a
              multistage fracturing job, it is desirable to flow the treatment fluid back after
              each stage to recover the fluid, because the shut-in time for the preceding
              stages will be too long, if the flow back is executed after the fracturing
              work at the last stage is completed. Then a problem is that offshore and
              geographically remote well operations often require the use of the drilling
              rig for completion operations. The time consumed on the completion phase

              Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs  © 2020 James Sheng.
              ISBN: 978-0-12-815905-7                  Published by Elsevier Inc.
              https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815905-7.00012-8  All rights reserved.  339 j
   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372