Page 431 - Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs
P. 431

Fracturing fluid flow back                                     399


              that a type II microemulsion is oil external and should be able to be well dis-
              placed by oil.
                 The right column of Fig. 12.55 compares the pressure drop for DI-water
              and three types of microemulsions. For the type I, the pressure drop was
              lower than that for DI-water, indicating the surfactant solution improved
              the matrix permeability. For the type II, the pressure drop was lower in
              the early time, but higher in the late time. For the type III, the pressure
              drop continued declining but was higher than that for DI-water later for a
              long time. These data show that the type I was most effective in improving
              the matrix permeability, followed by the type II, and the worst is the type III.
                 Overall, laboratory experiments have shown that surfactants regained
              more hydrocarbon permeability than fracturing water (Ahmadi et al.,
              2011; Rostami and Nasr-El-Din, 2014; Sayed et al., 2018; Dong et al.,
              2019).

              12.9.6 Injection of dry gas
              In principle, dry gas may be injected to vaporize liquid so that liquid phase
              trapping may be mitigated. Care may be taken if the trapped brine is
              concentrated with soluble ions. As the brine desiccates, the soluble ions
              may be precipitated and plug the pores, especially where divalent concentra-
              tions are high (Bennion et al., 1999).
                 This technique is proposed in gas condensate reservoirs in a huff-n-puff
              process (Meng et al., 2015a,b). This technique also has the mechanism of
              repressurization. However, it has not been reported in shale and tight reser-
              voirs to remove water blockage, probably due to economic concern and
              effectiveness.

              12.9.7 Formation heating

              Formation heating was proposed by Jamaluddin et al. (1995) to remove
              water-based phase traps and water reactive clay-induced damage in gas res-
              ervoirs. Hot gas is injected through the tubing. A zone of 2 m high and

              1.5e2 m in the radial depth is treated. Temperatures over 500 C lead to su-
              percritical extraction of trapped water and thermal decomposition and
              desensitization of reactive clays.
                 Roychaudhuri et al. (2014) conducted forced imbibition experiments of
              60 ppm surfactant solution into shale gas cores. The cores were saturated
              with gas and confined by 2500 psi. Then the surfactant solution was injected
              at one end with the other end closed. They found the imbibition rate of the
   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436