Page 259 - Envoys and Political Communication in the Late Antique West 411 - 533
P. 259

Negotium agendum

         carried out the embassy of Christ, as he was His servant’, by bring-
         ing about the excommunication of the Patriarch of Constantinople,
                  44
         Anthimus. Perhaps the most important reason for the use of bishops as
         envoys was to serve as oath-takers. At the conclusion of successful nego-
         tiations, oaths were sworn between the recipient of the embassy and the
         envoys, to whom their principal had delegated this right; the office of
         bishop constituted a trustworthy proxy. 45  As with provincial embassies,
         ecclesiastical sources give the misleading impression that clergy domi-
         nated palatine legations; the random prosopographical evidence suggests
         that this is not true. 46
           Like provincial bodies too, rulers employed leading private citizens
         as their envoys. This was particularly the case with rulers of Italy, both
         emperors and kings, who employed members of the Roman Senate in
         their intercourse with the eastern imperial court; the imperial court of
         Constantinople also employed members of the eastern Senate. 47  There

         44
           Liberatus of Carthage, Breviarium, 21: Imperator autem pro multis fisci expensis ab Italia destinatum
           exercitum avertere nolens,supplicationes papae noluit audire. At ille,quod suum fuit,Christi legatione
           fungebatur.
         45
           Ennodius, Vita Epiphani, 72, 91; Ep. Austr., 42 (the emperor Maurice to the Frankish king
           ChildebertII): in scriptis pollicita atque per sacerdotis firmata et terribilibus iuramentis roborata.
         46
           Contra Ennodius, Vita Epiphani, 136. Several times, Gregory of Tours mentions that an embassy
           consists of both bishops and leading officials or nobles, but names only the former (Hist. vi, 3;
           vi, 31; x, 19: Egidius of Rheims (butcf. vii, 14: Egidius’ companions are named, probably to
           implicate him in the treason of which he is ultimately accused; one of his companions is the dux
           and trouble-maker Guntram Boso, see PLRE iii, 571–4); ix, 18: Namatius of Orl´ eans, Bertram of
           Le Mans, cum comitibus et aliis viris magnificis; ix, 38:[legati] inter quos episcopi erant). For other sixth-
           and seventh-century Gallic embassies combining bishops and palatine officials: Ep. Austr., 25–39
           (the bishop Ennodius, the spatharius Grippo, the cubicularius Radan, and the notarius Eusebius),
           42 (the bishop Iocundus and the cubicularius Chotro); Fredegar, Chron. iv, 30 (bishop Aridius of
           Lyons, Rocco, and the comestabuli Eborinus; c. 607), 85 (Bishop Chanibertof Cologne and the
           maior domus Pippin; a. 641).
            Named bishops who undertake embassies in Gregory of Tours include: Hist. v, 40: Elafius of
           Chˆ alons-sur-Marne; v, 26, 29, 40: Eunius of Vannes; vi, 3: Leudovald of Bayeax; ix, 20: Gregory
           himself, and Felix, possibly bishop of Chˆ alons-sur-Marne, cf. ix, 41 (signature list) and PLRE iii,
           ‘Felix 7’, 482. Abbots: vii, 30: abbotof Cahors and another clericus; x, 31 § 17: Gunthar, abbot of
           StVenantius. Cf. M. Weidemann, Kulturgeschichte der Merowingerzeit nach den Werken Gregors von
           Tours (Mainz 1982), i, 133–4.
            For secular envoys in Gregory of Tours, see below, n. 49.
         47
           Western emperors: e.g. Rufius Antonius Agrypnius Volusianus, sent by Valentinian III to Theo-
           dosius II concerning arrangements for the dynastic wedding of 437 (Vita Melania ii, 19–24);
           Anicius Olybrius was possibly sent by Valentinian III to Constantinople; he was certainly sent
           by the emperor Leo I to Geiseric (Malalas, Chron. xiv, 45; Chron. Pasch., s.a. 464); Gennadius
           Avienus, sent by Valentinian III to Attila (Prosper, Chron., 1368); the deposed emperor Romulus
           sends envoys from the Senate on behalf of Odoacer to Zeno (Malchus, Fr., 14; this seems to
           be a separate embassy from the one sent by Odoacer himself, to which Zeno gives a separate
           reply, cf. Candidus, Fr., 1: another embassy from Odoacer to Zeno). Italian kings: Theoderic:
           the caput senatus Fl. Rufius Postumius Festus, twice, in 490 and c. 497 (PLRE ii, 467–9); the viri
           inlustris Fl. Anicius Probus Faustus Niger and Iranaeus (PLRE ii, 454–5, 625); possibly the caput
           senatus Symmachus (PLRE ii, 1045); the former prefect of Rome and patricius Fl. Agapitus (Cass.,
                                      233
   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264