Page 330 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 330

315
                       In addition to pitting of the silver plating, there were burnt  areas where it appeared as if  silver
                       plating had been melted by electrical arcing.
                         Closer investigation of the pitted areas seemed to show that corrosion on the waveguide internal
                       passages probably started on the exposed silver plated surface. It is theorized that these pits, however
                       formed, allowed attack of the underlying copper bearing base material.
                         A chemical analysis using X-ray diffraction analysis, subsequently verified by Fourier transform
                       infrared spectroscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, revealed that the debris is primarily
                       copper hydroxy nitrate Cu(OH),N03. To determine how it got there, a laboratory test was per-
                       formed to try to create the same debris on clean waveguide samples by placing on them a small
                       amount of nitric acid. Two hours later, a blue color was observed in the acid. After about 12 h, blue
                       crystals began forming at the silver plated interface. After 5 days, most of the solution had been
                       replaced  by  green corrosion  analyzed  as  a  copper  hydroxy  nitrate.  Nitric  acid  clearly caused
                       the corrosion.  Its source could be either faulty fabrication processes or arcing induced chemical
                       reactions.


                                                2.  FABRICATION  PROCESS
                         The silver plating on the brass waveguide is applied after the brass has undergone a multi step
                       surface preparation  process. First,  the  brass surface is cleaned and etched in a caustic cleaning
                       solution for 5-60  s. After subsequent rinsing under running tap water, the brass is immersed in a
                       bright dip solution for 5-20  s. This removes scratches and oxide, making the brass look shiny. The
                       bright dip solution is composed of 5-10%  tap water, 60-75%  sulfuric acid, 20-35%  nitric acid. To
                       remove the bright dip, parts are washed in running tap water. The use of pumice and a brush is
                       required for assemblies. The bright dip vendor specifies that this cleaning technique is suffcient.
                         Once bright dipping is complete, parts  should be first immersed in clean running  water,  then
                       boiling hot water, and then dried. To avoid contamination between one dip operation and another,
                       parts should be rinsed in running water, hot water and then dried at each step [l].
                         Both silver and copper bright dips exist to make either copper or silver shiny. Once silver plating
                       was complete, a bright dip step may have been inadvertently included despite its lack in vendor
                       process specifications. For instance, a silver bright  dip may have been performed  to relieve the
                       effects of poor silver plating, inadvertently leaving behind an acidic residue.

                                       3.  ARCING  INDUCED  CHEMICAL REACTIONS

                         If nitric acid was indeed produced by arcing, nitric oxide (NO) would need to be present. Colorless
                       and noncombustible, nitric oxide can be produced from atmospheric oxygen and nitrogen in the
                       presence of an electric arc. In this instance, such production is possible-there   was evidence of
                       arcing on the waveguide surface. In addition, arcing could have initiated pits in the silver plating,
                       exposing the underlying copper bearing base material to chemical attack.
                         A similar incident of corrosion in an aircraft waveguide system occurred about 20 years ago. In
                       that case, arcs were created in a clean noncorroded waveguide while gas samples were taken for an
                       analysis by mass spectrometry. An analysis of two samples is shown in Table 1.



                                                          Table 1.
                                                                Mole percent
                                                            Sample #I   Sample #2
                                           Hydrogen          0.001      0.003
                                           Water             0.003      0.002
                                           Nitrogen          79.816    79.819
                                           NO,  as nitric oxide   39 PPm   28 pm
                                           Oxygen            18.731    18.708
                                           Argon             1.015      1.022
                                           Carbon dioxide    0.430      0.443
   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335