Page 360 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 360

Failure Analysis Case Studies II
                   D.R.H. Jones (Editor)
                   0 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved                        345






                             SUSTAINED LOAD  CRACK  GROWTH  LEADING  TO
                          FAILURE IN  ALUMINIUM GAS  CYLINDERS IN  TRAFFIC


                                  J. W. H. PRICE*, R. N. IBRAHIM and D. ISCHENKO
                           Mechanical Engineering Department, Monash University, 900 Dandenong Road, East Caulfield,
                                                 Victoria 3145, Australia
                                                 (Received 26 June 1997)

                       Abstract-Some  common portable aluminium gas cylinders have shown a liability to develop cracking. This
                       cracking has in some cases led to leaks and on occasions to violent and sometimes fatal failures. There are a
                       number of features of this cracking which have not been properly explained. Previous modelling of the growth
                       of these cracks under sustained load has been developed from specimen testing. As is shown in this paper these
                       data produce results which appear to produce values of crack growth which are too slow by a factor of  the
                       order of lo* to explain the observed phenomenon. It also appears that crack growth can be rapid even in
                       cylinders with low levels of lead. This paper presents a numerical simulation of the growth of these defects
                       based on the local stresses in the vicinity of the crack edge. This information is related to cracks actually found
                       in cylinders which have leaked or failed in service. From this procedure an equation for the crack growth rate
                       is developed, This also leads to an explanation as to why “leak before break” is not always observed in these
                       cylinders. 0 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
                       Kejwords: Emhrittlement, pressure-vessel  failures,  residual  stress, slow  crack growth, sports equipment,
                       failures.







                                                1.  INTRODUCTION
                   Portable aluminium cylinders are in common use in the world for purposes such as self-contained
                   underwater breathing apparatus (SCUBA), respirators for fire and medical use and other uses. In
                   Australia  about  1,700,000 of  these cylinders are in  circulation, and  large numbers exist  in  all
                   developed countries. There has been a history of cracking developing in some of these cylinders in
                   the position shown in Fig. 1.


                   1.1.  The nature of the cracking
                     The cracking tends to grow from notches created during the forming process for the top end of
                   the cylinders and is driven by stress not only from the pressure contained in the cylinder, but also
                   residual stresses from their manufacture. Understanding the cracking and estimating the rate of
                   cracking growth is an objective which has interested a number of researchers in order to achieve a
                   basis for assessing acceptable defect sizes [I, 21.
                     The crack growth has in many quarters been stated to involve a phenomenon called solid metal
                   induced embrittlement (SMIE) where crack growth is aided by surface diffusion of certain elements,
                   the most important of which is lead. The cracks grow under constant load, so it is also described as
                   “sustained load cracking”. Since diffusion of elements is involved, there are some similarities to
                   creep crack growth and this terminology has also been used. The fundamentals of this process are
                   described elsewhere [2, 31.


                   ~~~       ~
                    *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
                   Reprinted from Engineering Failure Analysis 4 (4),  259-270 (1997)
   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365