Page 431 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 431

Failure Analysis Case Studies Ii
                     D.R.H. Jones (Editor)
                     0 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.  All rights reserved                       415






                                AN  AIR  CRASH  DUE TO  FATIGUE FAILURE  OF
                                                 A  BALL  BEARING


                                    I. SALAM, A. TAUQIR*, A. UL HAQ and A. Q. KHAN
                            Metallurgy Division, Dr. A. Q. Khan Research Laboratorics, GPO Box 502, Rawdlpindi, Pakistan
                                                   (Receitied I5 June 1998)

                         Abstract-The  failure analysis of an air crash conclusively shows that the cage of the central main bearing of
                         the compressor region failed due to fatigue. The broken piece of the cage got struck between the bearing balls
                         and the races and impaired the function of the bearing resulting in the crash. Q 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. A11
                         rights reserved.
                         Keywords: Accident investigation, aircraft failures, bearing failure, engine failurcs, fatigue.



                                                  1.  INTRODUCTION
                     A fighter plane crashed in  1996; Fig.  la. The plane had  two engines. The on site investigations
                     pointed  out that the fault was probably  in the compressor region of  one of the engines and the
                     problem was suspected to be in a bearing of the compressor region. In this region there are three
                     main bearings. Those at the front and back are roller bearings while the central one (CMB) is the
                     ball  bearing  type. The bearings are lubricated  by  way  of a  closed  loop lubrication  system and
                     metallic filters are inserted to clean the debris. The life of the CMB, which is suspected to have
                     caused the accident, is 600 h. The bearing of the engine which failed had completed a total of 467 h
                     and 5 h had elapsed since it was last inspected. The inspection report shows that the parameters
                     measured were within the specified limits. The CMB of the other engine had completed about 130
                     h and was found undamaged. There are some previous cases in which an aircraft landed safely after
                     an indication of a problem in the engine; in all these cases failures in the cages of the CMB were
                     detected. The cage of the CMB from the plane under consideration in this study was retrieved in a
                     broken condition (Fig. Ib).
                       To isolate the cause of failure, the bcaring components were subjected to detailed analysis. The
                     main components of the bearing included the steel balls, inner and outer races and the cage. The
                     material of these components was investigated and the details are summarized in Table I. The cage
                     material was subjected to detailed metallurgical investigations.
                       The retrieved balls exhibited significant wearlerosion. They were studied for smearing of foreign
                     material. Similarly the surfaces of the races were extensively deformed and these were analyzed to
                     investigate the deformation details and the material smeared on them.



                                                  2.  CMB  ASSEMBLY

                       The bearing  is mounted  on  the  compressor  shaft  and  is located  in  a  housing  [I].  The main
                     components of the CMB are inner and outer races on which the bearing ball roll and a soft cage to
                     keep the balls at a distance from each other. The arrangement of these components is shown in
                     Fig. 2.



                      *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
                     Reprinted from Engineering Failure Analysis 5 (4),  26 1-269 (1 998)
   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436