Page 238 - Fearless Leadership
P. 238

Aligning Emotionally and Intellectually  225


             whenever necessary; however, allowing decisions to slip out of alignment
             without formally realigning and communicating those changes to others
             is inefficient and ineffective.
               Committed partners are rigorous in making sure alignment sticks.
             They do not allow alignment to lapse. The moment circumstances change
             that threaten the alignment of the group, committed partners reaffirm their
             alignment or alter it, and appropriately communicate to others.
               How do committed partners prevent a breakdown in alignment from
             occurring? They hold each other accountable for maintaining or formally
             altering alignment when circumstances change. Their commitment is to
             sustain alignment and send a cohesive and consistent leadership message
             to the organization.
               Without emotional commitment, complying (also called a pocket veto)
             is a temporary adhesive with no sticking power. When leaders use a pocket
             veto, saying what others want to hear and giving in to group pressure, their
             unspoken communication is, “I’ll keep my true feelings in my pocket until
             the meeting is over. Then I’ll conspire against the decision and say how
             I really feel.”
               When leaders tolerate “good enough,” they withhold their ideas and
             contributions and accept things as they are. This disrupts the entire deci-
             sion-making process from alignment to execution. Complying comes at
             a huge cost: the loss of future possibilities and opportunities.

             Talking about Alignment as a Concept, and Not Defining
             It as a Behavior
             When leaders are sloppy and undisciplined in translating words into
             explicit behavior, they get sloppy and undisciplined results. Leaders lose
             their edge every time they throw words into a cauldron and reduce them
             down to meaningless phrases. All too often leaders bandy about buzzwords
             such as synergy, collective intelligence, and consensus decision making. But
             without shared meaning and clear behaviors, new terminology is worthless.
               How can you achieve and sustain alignment if you cannot define it in
             terms of behavior? The short answer is you can’t. Without providing
             explicit behavioral standards and guidelines, people cannot learn and
             apply new skills and tools. In a high performance organization, people
             share a common language that is broadly understood and applied with
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243