Page 33 - Fiber Fracture
P. 33

18                                                            K.K. Chawla

             withstand static fatigue. Slow strength degradation can occur due to static fatigue and
             eventually causing the optical glass fiber to fracture. With increasing usage of  optical
             glass fiber (some applications are very demanding, e.g. fiber optic cables buried in the
             top layer of the ocean floor), the issue of reliability has become very important.
               Many brittle, amorphous materials such as thermosetting polymers and silica-based
             inorganic glasses show some telltale markings on their fracture surfaces (Mecholsky et
             al.,  1977,  1979; Chandan et al.,  1994). Typically, the fracture surface of  a glass fiber
             shows four distinct regions. These regions are: a smooth mirror region, a misty region
             of small radial ridges, a hackle region consisting of large ridges, and finally a region of
             extensive crack branching. It turns out that the product of  strength, 0, and the square
             root of  the distance of  each of  these regions from the origin of  fracture, is a constant.
             One can write:
               0RY.’  = Ai

             where Ai  is a constant, Ri  the radius of the mirror-mist,  mist-hackle, or crack branching
             boundaries. These radii can be related to the initial flaw-depth, a, or the half-width, b,
             through the fracture mechanics analysis:
               c/Ri = K1,Y2/2A?
             where c = (ab)’.’,  Y  is a geometrical constant and  KI, is the critical stress intensity
             factor or fracture toughness. The relationship between the mirror radius and the fracture
             stress of the fiber can be used to generate a plot of   vs. 1/R:’2 as shown in Fig. 12. One
             can calculate the mirror constant Ai  from the slope of the lines. The mirror radius in the
             case of glass fibers was shown to be much greater than the mirror radius for the polymer-


                       T
                     0.6

                     0.5

                 n   0.4
                  a
                 a
                 c3
                     0.3

                     0.2
                                                                  0 CaO/Alumina
                     0.1                                          4 Fused Silica
                                                                  0 E-glass
                      0                                                         I
                       0        0.05      0.1     0.15      0.2      0.25      0.3
                                              I/R?  (l/rnm’”)

             Fig. 12.  Plot  of  fracture  stress (of) vs.  reciprocal  of  the  mirror radius  square root  (l/f?;’*)   showing the
             validity of the relationship between the fracture stress and the mirror radius of ceramic and glass fibers.
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38