Page 34 - Fiber Fracture
P. 34

FIBER FRACTURE: AN OVERVIEW                                           19

             derived ceramic fibers. The following mirror constants were obtained from the slope of
             their respective lines in Fig.  12 1.6 MPa m-'j2  for E-glass fiber and 2.2  MPa m-1/2
             for optical glass and CA fibers. The mirror constant for the fused-silica optical fiber is
             in good agreement with the Ai  value of  2.22  MPa m-'/2  and 2.1 MPa m-1/2 that was
             obtained for fused-silica fiber from Chandan et al. (1994) and Mecholsky et al. (1977),
             respectively. The mirror constants for E-glass and CaO/A1203 fibers are also in good
             agreement with previously determined Ai  values (Gupta, 1994; Sung and Sung, 1996).
                Fractographic work has been done by  a number of researchers on polymer-derived
             Sic fibers  (Sawyer  et  al.,  1987; Soraru  et  al.,  1993; Taylor et  al.,  1998), eutectic
             oxide-oxide  fiber (Yang et al.,  1996), and glass fibers (Mecholsky et al., 1977; Chandan
             et  al.,  1994; Gupta, 1994; Mecholsky, 1994; Sung and Sung, 1996). Polymer-derived
             Sic fibers have been  tested in  several studies and data containing the mirror radius
             measurements and flaw size measurements were obtained. Fracture surface examination
             showed two types of  flaws to be responsible for the fracture of  most of  the ceramic
             fibers: internal and surface flaws or defects. Internal flaws can consist of pores (Taylor
             et al., 1998), granular defects (Sawyer et al.,  1987), and voids. Pores can agglomerate
             at a certain region and form clusters, and these pore clusters behave similar to a single
             flaw. Granular defects (e.g.  a region of high carbon concentration in a Nicalon fiber) are
             aggregates of small (0.1 to 2 pm) granular particles.
                Surface flaws are common in optical fiber because of the processing technique used
             for the fabrication of  fused-silica fibers. They are also very common in other ceramic
             fibers such as alumina-based or silicon carbide-based fibers. Airborne particles as well
             as other elements tend to attach to the surface of the fiber during process or handling.
                Alumina-based  continuous  fibers  are  available commercially from  a  number  of
             sources. For example, Nextel series of  alumina-based fibers from 3M Co. Nextel 3 12,
             440, 480 (discontinued) have a mullite composition with varying amounts of  boria to
             restrict grain growth. Nextel 720 consists of  85 wt%  alumina + 15 wt% silica. Almax
             fiber from Mitsui Mining Co.  fiber while Saphikon is  a continuous monocrystalline
             alumina fiber (diameter between 75 and 225 pm) grown from melt by a process known
             as edge-defined film-fed growth process. Sometimes Saphikon fibers show undulations
             on the fiber surface, see Fig. 13. Typically fracture surface of such single crystal fibers
             show cleavage planes, see Fig. 14. These fibers typically have microvoids formed during
             fiber  growth  from the  melt.  One  important feature of  ceramic fibers  is  the  surface
              texture. Their surface roughness scales with grain size. Fig. 15a shows the rough surface
              of  an  alumina fiber while Fig.  15b shows the grain structure of  an  alumina fiber. The
             rough surface of such brittle fibers makes them break at very low strains and it makes
              very difficult to handle them in practice. The grain boundaries on the surface can act as
              notches and weaken the fiber. A surface layer of silica or boron nitride on alumina fiber
              can heal surface flaws and increase fiber strength. A polycrystalline mullite fiber (Nextel
             480), 10 pm in diameter, coated with boron nitride, showed an increase in the Weibull
              mean strength with increasing coating thickness up to 0.2  pm vis h vis the uncoated
              fiber, see Table 1 (Chawla et al.,  1997). This was due to the surface flaw heating effect
              of  the smooth BN  coating. However, for a thicker BN coating (1  pm), there was  a
              decrease in strength. This was because the soft BN coating at 1 pm thickness on a  10
              pm diameter fiber had a volume fraction of 0.31.
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39