Page 255 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 255

236               SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW

                     theory for A  > lo3 approximately. On the other hand, for A  < lo3, TPF theory tends to
                     underestimate u,d.  The argument of end effects just discussed may be invoked here also to
                     explain these differences. The critical flow velocity for divergence depends principally on
                     the excitation force QE) - which in the plug-flow model is proportional to MU2; this is
                     smaller for refined fluid mechanics, since M' < M. Hence, this translates to uTy > uT;p".
                     For the EBPF theory the value of U,d  is independent of  A and equal to u:fpF   = 6.66 (cf.
                     Figure 4.1  8),  which is considerably higher than  that  obtained by  the  more appropriate
                     TRF and TPF theories for A  < 1000 or so.

                     4.4.7  Stability of cantilevered pipes

                     Calculations for cantilevered pipes are conducted, utiiizing the outflow model developed
                     in  Section 4.4.5(b), i.e. the  'second'  or quadratic model with E  = 2.8. In this case N  =
                     7,  8  and 9 terms  in  the modal expansions (4.43) are necessary for convergence in  the
                     first, second and third modes of  the system, respectively. As in the previous section, the
                     three theories  (EBPF, TPF and  TRF)  are  compared to  one  another for  A  =   100
                     and  10.
                       Calculations for long pipes (A = 10l2) show that, similarly to the results of Figure 4.17
                     for clamped-clamped  pipes, the eigenfrequencies obtained by EBPF, TPF and TRF theo-
                     ries are essentially identical (in the scale of the Argand diagram, not shown for brevity)
                     in the lowest three modes. For shorter pipes, differences begin to become noticeable, as
                     shown in Figures 4.20 and 4.21 for A  = 100 and  10. The results of the EBPF theory are
                     not shown, for clarity.




                          8












                          0





                         -4'     I     I    I     I     I     I    I     I     I     I     I
                           0          4           8          12          16         20
                                                          %e  (w)
                     Figure 4.20  Dimensionless complex eigenfrequencies of  a cantilevered pipe (j3 = 0.3, y  = 10,
                     p  = 0 = 0, A  = 100, E  = 8.25) as functions of the dimensionless flow velocity u, according to the
                          two forms of  the Timoshenko theory. Key as in Figure 4.19 (Pai'doussis et al. 1986).
   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260