Page 284 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 284

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: LINEAR DYNAMICS I1              265

            to bracket the flutter conditions sufficiently closely, if  this type of  testing were used for
            the system motivating this study: the determination of the flutter boundary of aircraft via
            forced vibration testing.
              Another set of  forced vibration experiments was conducted by  Shilling & Lou (1980)
            with  a  vertical  cantilever  (made  of  PVC  and  of  Di = 17.6mm) with  several  masses
            attached  along  the  length  [see Figure 3.67(a)].  The  upstream  support  together  with  a
             suction pipe and a motor-pump unit were mounted on a horizontal track and oscillated by
            an exciter; the test pipe was partially or totally immersed in water, or totally surrounded
            by  air. It was found that, with internal flow, the response is richer in higher harmonics.
            Also, immersion appears to greatly enhance the modal content of the vibration, but this
            clearly depends on the forcing frequency; see also Sections 4.2.4, 4.3.2 and 4.4.10.


            4.6.2  Analytical methods for forced vibration

            Consider a simplified form of equation (3.70) for a cantilever conveying fluid, subject to
            a forcing function,

                               qrn’ + uy + zp”’u?j‘  +a$ + ij = f(& t),          (4.80)

             with boundary conditions (3.78). By  means of the Galerkin method  (Section 2.1.6), this
            equation may be discretized into

                   [MI($) + [C1(4}+ [KI(q) = {el,   Qj<t> =   1  4j(t>f(t*       (4.81)


            @j being the jth eigenfunction of a cantilever beam, and Qj the corresponding element of
             [e}. Here both [C] and  [K] are nondiagonal, nonsymmetric matrices, functions of u. To
            decouple the system, the methods described in equations (2.16)-(2.19) may be utilized,
             in which the system is first transformed into one of first order,
                                        [Bl[il+ [EIIzJ = {FI.                    (4.82)

            The asymmetry of  [C] and [K] means that [B] and [E] are also nonsymmetric. Hence, to
            decouple this system, one proceeds (PaTdoussis 1973b; Section 4) to solve the eigenvalue
             problem (p[B] + [EJ)(u} = (0) and its adjoint @[BIT + [E]T)[~} = (O},  from which the
             same set of  eigenvalues pj  are obtained, but  two different sets of  eigenvectors, x,  and
             $,,  leading to modal matrices [A] and  [N]. Because of  the weighted biorthogonality of
             the x,  and  $,,  [NIT[B][A] and  [NIT[E][A] are diagonal, an easily proved result. Hence,
             introducing the transformation
                                            (7.1  = [AI{O                        (4.83)

             into (4.82) and pre-multiplying by  [NIT, one obtains an equation of  the form
                                   [Jlt41+ [LIIO = [NIT{F} = {@I?                (4.84)

             in which [J] and [L] are diagonal; thus the system has been decoupled and hence is easily
             solvable. A particular example of  excitation f((, t) due to a random pressure field (e.g.
             turbulence-induced excitation) is given in Paidoussis (1973b) for external axial flow which
   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289