Page 322 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 322

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: NONLINEAR AND CHAOTIC DYNAMICS          303

                              I .oo


                             0.96


                           3 0.92
                           ‘g
                           2
                           .-   0.88
                           3
                           .-
                           p  0.84
                           ;a
                           .-  -
                           E
                           E
                              0.80
                             0.76


                              0.72
                                 0     I     2     3     4     5     6     7
                                           Maximum tension increase/(EI/L*)
               Figure 5.3  The  variation  of  the  fundamental  period  of  oscillation  versus  motion  (amplitude)
               related tension variation for a pinned-pinned  pipe with  = i, f = 1 (Thurman & Mote  1969b).


               to be  discussed  next, is related to the increase  in mean  tension  due to  moderate  lateral
               deformations.


               5.5.2  The post-divergence dynamics

              The question of post-divergence coupled-mode flutter has already been discussed from the
               linear viewpoint in Section 3.4.1, where the paradox of  how its existence may be recon-
               ciled with the fact of  zero energy input was elucidated via the work of Done & Simpson
               ( 1977). However, there is no question that the existence or nonexistence of coupled-mode
               flutter has to be decided via nonlinear theory. This was done in two remarkable, authori-
              tative studies by Holmes (1977,  1978), the latter of which is categorically entitled  ‘Pipes
               supported at both  ends cannot flutter’.’  Holmes  was the first to use the modern tools of
               nonlinear dynamics for the analysis of  two fluidelastic systems: the pipe conveying fluid
               and a panel in axial flow (Holmes  1977, 1978; Holmes & Marsden  1978). Some further
               work was done by Ch’ng (1977, 1978), Ch’ng & Dowel1 (1979) and Lunn (1982).
                 As discussed  in  Section 5.2.9(b),  Holmes  considered pipes  with positively  supported
               (non-sliding) ends, and obtained a nonlinear equation of motion by adding to Pa1doussis &
              Issid’s (1974) linear equation a nonlinear term representing the mean, deformation-induced
              tensioning - the principal nonlinearity. Thus, taking a component of 7; in equation (3.38)
              to be as in (5.63), the dimensionless form of the equation used, with Q = u and U  = I7 =

                 +This is the ultimate in an executive summary: the main conclusion can be read  in the title.  In these  busy
              times, this practice ought to be strongly  encouraged!
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327