Page 321 - Fluid mechanics, heat transfer, and mass transfer
P. 321

SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGERS
            302
            TABLE 10.8 Some Considerations for the Choice of Heat Exchanger Design
            Exchanger Type  Materials              Cleaning                              Comments
            Shell and tube  Most materials         Tubes easier to clean; shell more difficult to  Widely used
                                                     clean
            Plate           Usually stainless steel  Easy to clean                       Compact
            Plate-fin        Al, stainless steel, titanium  Only chemical cleaning possible  Highly compact
            Double pipe     Carbon steel common    Inner tube easier to clean; annulus difficult or  Used for small area
                                                     impossible if welded                 requirements
            Immersion coils  Most materials        Inside tubes only through chemical cleaning  Limited application
            Spiral          Most materials         Easy access                           Compact; useful for fouling
                                                                                          fluids and slurries
            Air-cooled      Al fins on carbon steel  Inside tubes easier, finned surfaces difficult  Large area required for
                              tubes common, other                                         installation
                              combinations possible
            Scraped surface  Most materials        Generally self-cleaning               Have moving parts
            Graphite block  Graphite               Mechanical cleaning not possible, chemical  Useful for corrosives
                                                     cleaning possible




                  reduction in performance. Since the difficulty in     flow lies between two regimes (e.g., transition from
                  cleaning increases rapidly as the scale thickness or  slug flow to annular flow to misty flow), slight
                  deposit increases, the intervals between cleanings   changes in process conditions (e.g., flow rate, vapor
                  should not be excessive.                             quality, or pressure) can alter the local axial and
                 & Fouling can be detected through pressure drop mon-  circumferential heat transfer coefficient that alters
                  itoring, as nonuniform rough fouled surfaces increase  the tube wall temperatures with consequent fouling
                  pressure drops.                                      rates.
                 & With water-cooled exchangers, performance degra-  . What are the remedies for making vapor–liquid distri-
                  dation could also be due to decreased flow rates.   bution more uniform under two-phase flow conditions?
                  Therefore, all the other possibilities, namely, air or  & Use of tube inserts and alternative baffle designs may
                  vapor binding (accumulation) on the surfaces and     improve vapor and liquid phase distribution inside
                  decreased flow rates should be examined before        and outside tubes, respectively.
                  concluding on the fouling process.                 & Avoiding film boiling through use of lower pressure
                 & Buildup of noncondensables could be checked by      steam as heating medium in tubular heaters and
                  monitoring the temperature of the vent gases at      adjustments in firing rates and proper temperature
                  constant condensing pressure. If the temperature is  control through burner management and tube side
                  close to that of the cooling water, flow rate of cooling  flow rates in fired heaters are some measures for
                  water may be increased.                              controlling fouling.
               . Under what conditions, fouling deposits will not be  . Suggest suitable guidelines for mitigating fouling
                uniform on the heat transfer surfaces?               problems.
                 & Under two-phase conditions, the pattern of fouling  & Evaluation of Causes andEffects of Fouling: During
                  will not be uniform and significant localized fouling  start-up, flow rates might be low leading high tube
                  can occur because part of the surfaces may become    wall temperatures. Alternative start-up procedures
                  dry because of contact with vapor bubbles.           involving stabilizing flow rates with, for example,
                 & Evaporators and reboilers suffer from maldistribu-  careful firing rates in fired heaters.
                  tion of vapor–liquid phases.                         ➢ In coolers, cooling of hot process streams might
                 & Use of high-pressure steam as heating medium pro-     cause scaling of tube walls. Use of higher tube
                  motes film boiling inside tubes because of large        velocities (>2 m/s) and use of additives might be
                  temperature differences, with the consequent in-       used to keep tube wall temperatures low. It must
                  crease in fouling rates.                               be recognized that in such situations, DP might
                                                                         increase. Swirling flow might be created by use of
                 & Less than satisfactory performance in fired heaters
                                                                         tube inserts, particularly in transition regions from
                  is possible under unexpected two-phase conditions.
                                                                         annular to mist flow.
                  If, under normal operating conditions, two-phase
   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326