Page 203 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 203

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: LINEAR DYNAMICS I              185

                Benjamin (1961b) conducted a set of model experiments with articulated pipes made up
              of  segments of  brass or glass tubes (typically 12.7 mm  in  diameter, 0.20-0.62  m long),
              interconnected by joints made of short lengths of  rubber tubing bound to the rigid tubes
              securely with wire. Care was taken to relieve stresses at the joints and to ensure a smooth
              flow passage from tube to joint and on to the next tube. Some experiments were conducted
              with kl  = k2  2 0 by replacing each rubber joint by the neck of  a toy balloon. The fluid
              was water (B = 0.18,0.31 and 0.32). In some experiments, the pipe was vertical and in
              others horizontal (essentially as described in  Section 3.5.6). In  a few  cases, both  ends
              were supported.
                Virtually all of  the general qualitative observations made in Section 3.5.6 for flexible
              pipes have been noted earlier by Benjamin in his articulated pipe experiments: the violence
              of the divergence instability (which had to be limited by restricting its unimpeded growth,
              otherwise resulting in  a  broken joint),  the  destabilization of  a  cantilevered system by
              lightly touching the free end, limit-cycle motion, ‘induced’ versus self-excited flutter and
              hysteresis, etc.
                Agreement between theoretical and experimental critical flow velocities was impressive:
              l&   = 0.34 versus 0.36ds for divergence and U,f  = 0.65 versus 0.68 ds for flutter are
              typical of  a set of  18 experiments.
                The ‘mode exchange’, already discussed in Section 3.5.1, also arises in the case of artic-
              ulated systems, as demonstrated by Sugiyama & Noda (1981) and as shown in Figure 3.77,
              where it is seen that the mode loci come very close together before the switch actually
              takes  place.  The  Argand  diagram  for  B = 0.50 is  identical to  one  of  those  originally
              obtained by  Benjamin (1961a).



                                      4




                                      3

                                         :

                                      2g



                                      1
                                      r UCf = 2. I 23

                                      \2S
                                                                                      .
                                         A
                                         %t$4)                                        1

              Figure 3.77  The  ‘mode exchange’ from second- to first-mode flutter for an articulated cantilever
              with varying j3  for y  = 0: (a) for B increasing, starting with j3 = 0.50; (b) for  decreasing, starting
                                   with j3 = 0.55 (Sugiyama & Noda  1981).
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208