Page 256 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 256

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: LINEAR  DYNAMICS  I1            237

              Considering Figure 4.20 first, it is noticed that the eigenfrequencies as given by  TRF
            theory are higher than those obtained by TPF theory; the critical flow velocities for flutter
            obtained by  refined  fluid mechanics  (TRF theory) are  also higher.  These observations
            are  once  again  consistent  with  the  concept  of  a  smaller effective fluid  mass  per  unit
            length, M’, for the refined fluid mechanics, as compared to simple fluid mechanics. At the
            same values of flow velocity and mode number, the absolute value of the eigenfrequency
            obtained by  the refined theory,  Iurefl, is  always larger than that  obtained by  the  simple
            theory,  JwsimpI. Moreover, it is  clear that  M’  becomes increasingly smaller than  M  for
            larger mode numbers (larger discrepancies in Figure 4.20); this is consistent with the fact
            that M  = pAf  applies only if  the wavelength of deformation is long, as compared to the
            internal diameter of the pipe (Section 3.5.8) - which is not the case here for the second
            and third  modes. In  this connection it is recalled (Section 3.5.1) that  the modal  shapes
            for u  > 0 contain components of higher zero-flow beam eigenfunctions, which reinforces
            the foregoing argument.

                           I    I     I    I     I    I     I    I     I    I     I

















                      -                                                             -


                   4,      I     I    I     I         I     I    I     I    I     I
                     0           4         8          12         16         20
                                                   9?c  (w)

            Figure 4.21  Dimensionlcss  complex  eigenfrequencies  of  a  very  short  cantilevered  pipe
            (B = 0.3, y  = 10. p = o = 0, A  = 10, E  = 2.61) as  functions of  the  dimensionless flow  velocity
            11,  according to the two forms of the Timoshenko theory. Key  as in Figure 4.19 (Pai’doussis et nl.
                                               1986).
              However, the  extension of  this  argument to  the  question of  stability of  cantilevered
            pipes should be approached with caution, as loss of  stability is not controlled by  a single
            fluid-dynamic force  term  (as  for  clamped-clamped  pipes),  but  by  two - namely QE,’
            and QLi’  of  equations (4.49) and  (4.67); it is a balance between these two forces which
            precipitates instability (Section 3.2.2). Indeed, as will be seen later, there are cases where
            ucf according to TRF theory is lower than that obtained by TPF theory (plug-flow model).
            in contrast to the results of  Figure 4.20.
              A  good deal  of  the  foregoing discussion also applies to Figure 4.21.  However, in  a
            sense. this represents a very special case, since according to Timoshenko plug-flow (TPF)
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261