Page 259 - Forensic Structural Engineering Handbook

LOADS AND HAZARDS: THEIR NATURE, MAGNITUDE, AND CONSEQUENCES 7.43

connections to slip under load. Furthermore, if structural materials are susceptible to
stress relaxation, these effects must be considered when determining the residual forces
in members.

REFERENCES

1. American Society of Civil Engineers, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,
ASCE 7-05, New York, 2005.
2. American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc., Manual of Steel Construction, Load and Resistance
Factor Design, 3d ed., AISC, Chicago, 2001.
3. American Concrete Institute, Standard Specifications for Tolerances for Concrete Construction
and Materials (ACI 117-06), American Concrete Institute Committee 117, 2006.
4. “Local Climatological Data Daily Summary,” National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, NC.
5. T. A. Reinhold, ed., “Wind Tunnel Modeling for Civil Engineering Applications,” Proceedings of
the International Workshop on Wind Tunnel Modeling Criteria and Techniques in Civil
Engineering Applications, Cambridge University Press, Gaithersburg, MD, Cambridge and New
York,1982.
6. N. Stubbs and D. C. Perry, “Engineering of the Building Envelope,” Proceedings of the ASCE
Conference on Hurricanes of 1992, Miami, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston,
VA,1993.
7. D. Surry, R. B. Kitchen, and A. G. Davenport, “Design Effectiveness of Wind Tunnel Studies for
Buildings of Intermediate Height,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 4(1): 96–116, 1977.
8. P. C. Sachs, Wind Forces in Engineering, vol. 3, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, 1972.
9. N. Cook, The Designer’s Guide to Wind Loading of Building Structures, Part I, Butterworth,
London, UK, 1985.
10. E. Simiu and R. H. Scanlan, Wind Effects on Structures, 3d ed., Wiley, New York, NY, 1996.
11. D. W. Boggs and J. A. Peterka, “Wind Speeds for Design of Temporary Structures,” Proceedings
of the ASCE Tenth Structures Congress, San Antonio, TX, April 13–15, 1992, pp. 800–803.
12. H. I. Shapiro, J. P. Shapiro, and L. K. Shapiro, Crane and Derricks, 2d ed., McGraw-Hill, New
York, NY, 1991.
13. H. D. Nix, C. P. Bridges, and M. G. Powers, Wind Loading on Falsework, Part I, Caltrans
Publication, Sacramento, CA, June 1975.
14. B. J. Vickery, P. N. Georgiou, and R. Church, “Wind Loading on Open-Framed Structures,” Third
Canadian Workshop on Wind Engineering, Vancouver and Toronto, Canada, 1981.
15. Robert D. Blevins, Flow-Induced Vibration, 2d ed., Krieger, Malabar, FL, 1994.
16. Federal Emergency Management Agency, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic
Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, 2003 edition, Part 2—Commentary, FEMA
303, 2004.
17. R. K. McGuire, G. R. Toro, and W. J. Silva, “Engineering Model of Earthquake Ground Motion
for Eastern North American,” Report NP-6074, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA,
October 1988.
18. Weston Geophysical Corporation, “Seismic Design Recommendation, Massachusetts Water
Resources Authority, Deer Island Secondary Treatment Facility,” Weston geophysical report pre-
pared for Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., Wakefield, MA, 1989.
19. G. M. Kinson and D. M. Boore, “Ground Motion Relations for Eastern North America,” Bulletin
of the Seismological Society of America 85: 17–30, 1995.
20. G. R. Martin and R. Dobry, “Earthquake Site Response and Seismic Code Provisions,” NCEER
Bulletin, 8: 1–6, 1994.
21. D. Sadigh, C. Y. Chang, N. A. Abrahamson, S. J. Chiou, and M. S. Power, “Specifications of Long
Period Ground Motions; Updated Attenuation Relationships for Rock Site Conditions and