Page 55 - Formation Damage during Improved Oil Recovery Fundamentals and Applications
P. 55

Low-Salinity Water Flooding: from Novel to Mature Technology  37


              Zeinijahromi et al., 2011, 2013). However, fines migration and its size-
              exclusion effects can also result in severe damage to reservoir permeability,
              which leads to declines of well injectivity in the case of injection wells, and
              productivity in case of production wells. During low-salinity waterflooding,
              the majority of injection pressure loss occurs in the vicinity of the
              wellbores. This is attributed to the high fluid flow velocities in these zones.
                 Therefore, understanding how to control or avoid fines migration in
              reservoirs is an important issue for LSWF. On the one hand, it is desirable
              to control fines migration to take advantages of its positive effects far
              from the wellbore. On the other, it is important to minimize its negative
              formation damage impacts near the wellbores. Here, we develop a mathe-
              matical framework for designing a nanofluid-slug, preflush to enhance
              well injectivity, while maintaining the mobility control assisted by fines
              migration that contributes to improving LSWF performance (both EOR
              and well injectivity).
                 During LSWF, the injected low-salinity fluid gradually sweeps out of
              the reservoir the in-situ fluids with higher salinity. In the low-salinity
              environment where smaller amounts of ions exist, according to the theory
              of Debye and Hu ¨ckel (1923), the Debye-length (Double layer thickness
              in of the 1910 Gouy-Chapman theory, Greathouse et al., 1994) would
              increase. Therefore, the effects of fluid salinity can be reflected by changes
                                            21
              to the inverse Debye-length, κ,m  (Elimelech et al. 1995), as shown in
              Eq. (2.6):

                                     s ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi

                                                        ð
                                       X
                                   11
                                           C mi;i S wc 1 C mi;j S w 2 S wc Þ
                       κ 5 0:73 3 10                               z i 2  (2.6)

                                                     S w
                                   th
              where, C mi is the molar i ion concentration in water phase (injected and
                                      3
                                                         th
              initial conditions), moles/m ; Z i is a valence of i ion. This relationship
              indicates that as the saturation of injected low-salinity water increases, the
              inverse Debye-length would decrease; thereby, the repulsive energy
              among the particles increases, and the bonding force among particles
              attenuates. The double electric layer repulsive energy V DLR is described
              by the DLVO (Derjagin Landau Verwey Overbeek) theory, as as
              expressed by Eq. (2.7):
                                      128πr FP n N k B T
                              V DLR 5               ς FP ς GS e 2κh       (2.7)
                                            κ 2
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60