Page 196 - T. Anderson-Fracture Mechanics - Fundamentals and Applns.-CRC (2005)
P. 196

1656_C004.fm  Page 176  Thursday, April 21, 2005  5:38 PM





                       176                                   Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications


                          The advantage of Equation (4.2) is that the displacement and displacement rate can be measured
                       experimentally. The transition time is defined at the moment in the test when the ratio E /U = 1. In
                                                                                             k
                       order to obtain an explicit expression for t , it is convenient to introduce a dimensionless displacement
                                                       τ
                       coefficient D:
                                                             tt ()∆
                                                              ˙
                                                          D =                                     (4.4)
                                                              ∆  t ()
                                                                  t τ
                       If, for example, the displacement varies with time as a power law: ∆ = βtγ, then D = γ . Combining
                       Equation (4.2) and Equation (4.4) and setting E /U = 1 leads to
                                                             k
                                                                 W
                                                          t  τ  D =  Λ  c o                       (4.5)

                          Nakamura et al. [18, 19] performed a dynamic finite element analysis on a three-point bend
                       specimen in order to evaluate the accuracy of Equation (4.2) and Equation (4.5). Figure 4.3 compares
                       the E /U ratio computed from a finite element analysis with that determined from the experiment
                           k
                       and Equation (4.2). The horizontal axis is a dimensionless time scale, and c  is the longitudinal
                                                                                      1
                       wave speed in an unbounded solid. The ratio W/c is an estimate of the time required for a stress
                                                               1
                       wave to traverse the width of the specimen. Based on Equation (4.2) and the experiment, t c /W ≈ 28
                                                                                             τ  1
                       (or t c /H ≈ 24), while the finite element analysis estimated t c /W ≈ 27. Thus the simple model
                          τ  o
                                                                         τ  1
                       agrees quite well with a more detailed analysis.
                          The simple model was based on the global kinetic energy and did not consider discrete stress
                       waves. Thus the model is only valid after stress waves have traversed the width of the specimen
                       several times. This limitation does not affect the analysis of the transition time, since stress waves
                       have made approximately 27 passes when t  is reached. Note, in Figure 4.3, that the simple model
                                                          τ
                       agrees very well with the finite element analysis when tc /W > 20.
                                                                     1



























                       FIGURE 4.3  Ratio of kinetic to stress work energy in a dynamically loaded three-point bend specimen.
                       Taken from Nakamura, T., Shih, C.F., and Freund, L.B., “Three-Dimensional Transient Analysis of a Dynam-
                       ically Loaded Three-Point-Bend Ductile Fracture Specimen.” ASTM STP 995, Vol. I, American Society for
                       Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1989, pp. 217–241.
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201