Page 214 - Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery

202 Mohammad Ali Ahmadi

[6] S. Thomas, Enhanced oil recovery—an overview, Oil Gas Sci Technol—Revue de l’IFP 63 (2008)
9 19.
[7] R. Seright, J. Liang, A survey of field applications of gel treatments for water shutoff, SPE Latin
America/Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1994.
[8] R. Sydansk, G. Southwell, More than 12 years of experience with a successful conformance-
control polymer gel technology, SPE/AAPG Western Regional Meeting, Society of Petroleum
Engineers, 2000.
[9] M. Bavie `re, Basic Concepts in Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes, Springer, Netherlands, 1991.
[10] T. Austad, B. Matre, J. Milter, A. Saevareid, L. Øyno, Chemical flooding of oil reservoirs 8.
Spontaneous oil expulsion from oil- and water-wet low permeable chalk material by imbibition of
aqueous surfactant solutions, Colloids Surf., A 137 (1998) 117 129.
[11] H. Chen, L. Lucas, L. Nogaret, H. Yang, D. Kenyon, Laboratory monitoring of surfactant imbibi-
tion using computerized tomography, SPE International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition in
Mexico, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2000.
[12] O. Wagner, R. Leach, Improving oil displacement efficiency by wettability adjustment, Trans.
AIME 216 (1959) 65 72.
[13] T. Austad, J. Milter, Spontaneous imbibition of water into low permeable chalk at different wett-
abilities using surfactants, International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Society of Petroleum
Engineers, 1997.
[14] E. Spinler, D. Zornes, D. Tobola, A. Moradi-Araghi, Enhancement of oil recovery using a low con-
centration of surfactant to improve spontaneous and forced imbibition in chalk, SPE/DOE
Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2000.
[15] L. Treiber, W. Owens, A laboratory evaluation of the wettability of fifty oil-producing reservoirs,
Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 12 (1972) 531 540.
[16] G.V. Chilingar, T. Yen, Some notes on wettability and relative permeabilities of carbonate reservoir
rocks, II, Energy Sources 7 (1983) 67 75.
[17] H. Guo, M. Dou, W. Hanqing, F. Wang, G. Yuanyuan, Z. Yu, et al., Proper use of capillary number
in chemical flooding, J. Chem. 2017 (2017) 1 11.
[18] R.A. Fulcher Jr, T. Ertekin, C. Stahl, Effect of capillary number and its constituents on two-phase
relative permeability curves, J. Pet. Technol. 37 (1985) 249 260.
[19] M.A. Ahmadi, S.R. Shadizadeh, Implementation of a high-performance surfactant for enhanced oil
recovery from carbonate reservoirs, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 110 (2013) 66 73.
[20] M.A. Ahmadi, Y. Arabsahebi, S.R. Shadizadeh, S.S. Behbahani, Preliminary evaluation of mulberry
leaf-derived surfactant on interfacial tension in an oil-aqueous system: EOR application, Fuel 117
(2014) 749 755.
[21] D. Myers, Surfaces, Interfaces and Colloids, Wiley-VCH, New York, NYetc, 1990.
[22] O. Guertechin, Surfactant: classification, handbook of detergents. Part A—Properties, Surfactant
Sci. Ser. 82 (1999) 40.
[23] D. Myers, Surfactant Science and Technology, John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
[24] O.A. de Swaan, Analytic solutions for determining naturally fractured reservoir properties by well
testing, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 16 (1976) 117 122.
[25] M.J. Rosen, J.T. Kunjappu, Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken,
United States, 2012.
[26] M.A. Ahmadi, S.R. Shadizadeh, Experimental investigation of adsorption of a new nonionic surfac-
tant on carbonate minerals, Fuel 104 (2013) 462 467.
[27] M.A. Ahmadi, S.R. Shadizadeh, Experimental investigation of a natural surfactant adsorption on
shale sandstone reservoir rocks: Static and dynamic conditions, Fuel 159 (2015) 15 26.
[28] Sarem, A., 1974. Secondary and tertiary recovery of oil by MCCF (mobility-controlled caustic
flooding) process. In: Paper SPE, 4901.
[29] J.J. Sheng, Status of alkaline flooding technology, J. Pet. Eng. Technol. 5 (2015) 44 50.
[30] C. Johnson Jr, Status of caustic and emulsion methods, J. Pet. Technol. 28 (1976) 85 92.
[31] E. Mayer, R. Berg, J. Carmichael, R. Weinbrandt, Alkaline injection for enhanced oil recovery—a
status report, J. Pet. Technol. 35 (1983) 209 221.