Page 253 - Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery
P. 253

Enhanced Gas Recovery Techniques From Coalbed Methane Reservoirs                    241



                                              k
                                                           ð
                                                5 exp 23c f σ 2 σ i Þ                     (8.5)
                                              k i
                   where σ is the effective horizontal stress normal to cleats, σ i is the initial effective hor-
                   izontal stress normal to cleats, c f is the cleat volume compressibility, P ε is the matrix
                   deformation Langmuir pressure, and ε l is the matrix-shrinkage coefficient.
                      Based on their model, Shi and Durucan claimed that the matrix-shrinkage term is
                   1.5 3 times stronger than Palmer and Mansoori model. Indeed, they postulated that
                   Palmer and Mansoori model has an extra multiplier in the matrix-shrinkage term
                   causing the model to underestimate matrix-shrinkage term [27].



                   8.2.5 Coal Density
                   Coal density is among the important parameters for reservoir engineering purposes
                   and is inserted as an input property in simulation studies. Coal density is typically less
                   than that of conventional reservoirs and differs from seam to seam based on the given
                   coal rank and purity [2]. The bulk density of a coal consists of the matrix and the
                   void space, with the latter being expectedly filled with water. The dry coal density,
                   however, is only made up of matrix system density. The coal density is supposed to
                   increase with coalification, implying that high-rank coals are denser than low-rank
                   coal rocks [16]. The bulk coal density was presented by Seidle as a function of the
                   densities of entailed ash, moisture, and the organic rock with their corresponding
                   weight percentage, with the assumption of no free or sorbed gas available in the cleat
                   system [2].
                                                          1
                                                                                          (8.6)
                                      ρ 5
                                           ð 1 2 a 2 wÞ=ρ 1 a=ρ 1 w=ρ
                                                        o       a        w
                   where ρ is the coal bulk density, ρ is the organic fraction density, ρ is the ash density,
                                                                              a
                                                 o
                   ρ is the water density.
                    w
                      It should also be noted that o, a, and w represent the weight percentage of organic,
                   ash, and water content of the rock, respectively.
                      Eq. (8.6) shows that depending upon the organic and inorganic content of the
                   coal rock, the rock density could vary substantially. In lack of the laboratory measure-
                   ments for a given coal rock, the organic and ash densities are assumed 1.25 and
                            3
                   2.55 g/cm , respectively. These numbers allude that for a high-rank coal, being denser
                   in essence, with a low ash content, the density might be lower than a low-rank coal
                   with a vast presence of ash inside the coal rock. Additionally, the density of
                   organic fraction of coal rock is further dependent on maceral composition of that par-
                   ticular coal.
   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258