Page 294 - Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery
P. 294

282                                                                    Mohammad Ali Ahmadi


                   The test was conducted in 2014. There were one injection well and several offset
                wells. In the first 3 months, the well injection rate was 1700 STB/day and later
                reduced to 1000 STB/day because of breakthrough at a close offset well [40]. The
                close offset well (about 880 ft away) had a huge increase in water production, but the
                oil rate did not increase during this time. The water broke after 1 week.
                   One water huff-n-puff pilot test was conducted in the North Dakota part of the
                Bakken Formation in 2012. The injection time was just over 1 month, the soaking
                time was 2 weeks, and the production time was 3 4 months. The injection rate was
                1200 bbl/day. No water injectivity problem was observed, but little to no oil rate was
                increased [40].
                   According to the pilot test of produced water re-injection with huff-n-puff setting
                that has been done in the Parshall field, there is no significant improvement of the oil
                recovery factor after employing such a method. In this scenario that is performed on
                spring of 2012, the duration of water injection was about 30 days and 10 days as a
                soaking period; after that time the production was open to flow [1].
                   Table 9.2 presents several field tests that have been performed in shale oil reservoirs
                located in China. This table provides general information regarding the type of injec-
                tion mode as well as rock and fluid characterization (some of them not reported).
                Also, the performance of each field test is reported in Table 9.2 [1].
                   Huff-n-puff water injection was also performed in the Chang 6 reservoir,
                Yanchang oil field near Qieli Village, Ordos Basin, China (huff-n-puff 4 in
                Table 9.2) [1].
                   Huff-n-puff water injection was also successfully tested in Toutai reservoir,
                Daqing. The permeability was 1.25 mD, and the huff-n-puff cycle was half to one
                year [1]. Huff-n-puff water injection was tested in 2007 in Well Niu 15-5 in
                Niuquanhu reservoir, Tuha Field. The permeability in this area was 0.42 7.84 mD.
                The soaking time was 108 days. Two cycles were performed with incremental oil of
                1816 tons [1]. Huff-n-puff water injection was performed in Duha Field, Xingjiang,
                China (huff-n-puff 5 in Table 9.2). Water was injected in Well Ma-55 from July 18,
                                                               3
                2014 to July 24, 2014. The injection rate was 285 m /day. The total injected water
                                  3
                volume was 2000 m . The oil rate before water injection was 0.9 tons/day and the
                water cut was 16%. After the huff-n-puff water injection, the oil rate was 5 tons/day
                and the water rate was kept constant until the reporting date (August 2015) [1].



                     9.4 ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF SHALE OIL
                     AND GAS PRODUCTION

                     Owing to the growing concern regarding climate change and energy demand,
                using natural gas as a clean-burning and affordable source of energy has been
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299