Page 206 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs

186 GEOMECHANICS OF GAS SHALES

Daixu T, Jinhai Z, Wang H. Technology analysis and enlighten­ Fairhurst C, Lacabanne WD. Hard rock drilling techniques. Mine
ment of drilling engineering applied in the development of Quarry Eng 1957;23:157–161.
Barnett shale gas in America. Sino‐Global Energy 2011;16 Farmer IW. Main Lecture: Rock Testing — Deficiencies and Selection.
(4):47–52. In: Rakowski Z, editor. Proceedings of the International
Deliac EP. Optimisation des machines d’Abbatage à Pics [PhD Conference on Geomechanics 1992. Balkema, Hradec, Ostrava,
Thesis]. Paris: Universite Pierre et Marie Curie; 1986. Czecho‐Slovakia. pp 3–7.
Desai CS, Salami MR. A constitutive model and associated testing Fjaer E, Ruistuen H. Impact of the intermediate principal stress on
for soft rock. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 1987;24 (5):299–307. the strength of heterogeneous rock. J Geophys Res Solid Earth
Detournay E, Defourny P. A phenomenological model for the dril­ 2002;107 (B2):1–10.
ling action of drag bits. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Fjaer E, Holt RM, Horsrud P, Raaen AM, Risnes R. Chapter 3:
Abs 1992;29 (1):13–23. Geological aspects of petroleum related rock mechanics. Dev
Detournay E, Sarout J, Tan C, Caurel J. Chemoporoelastic parameter Petrol Sci 1992;33:89–108.
identification of a reactive shale. In: Huyghe JM, Raats PAC, Franklin JA. Triaxial strength of rock material. Rock Mech
Cowin SC, editors. Symposium on Mechanics of Physico­ 1971;3:86–98.
chemical and Electrochemical Interactions in Porous Media. Frydman M, da Fontoura SAB. Modeling aspects of wellbore
Berlin: Springer; 2006. International Union of Theoretical and stability in shales. In: SPE 69529, SPE Latin American and
Applied Mechanics. Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, March 25–28,
Dewhurst DN, Hennig A. Geomechanical properties related to top 2001. Buenos Aires; 2001.
seal leakage in the Carnarvon Basin, Northwest Shelf. Aust Gatelier N, Pellet F, Loret B. Mechanical damage of an anisotropic
Petrol Geosci 2003;9:255–263. porous rock in cyclic triaxial tests. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci
Dewhurst DN, Aplin AC, Sarda JP, Yang Y. Compaction‐driven 2002;39:335–354.
evolution of porosity and permeability in natural mudstones: An Gazaniol D, Forsans T, Boisson MJF, Piau J‐M. Wellbore failure
experimental study. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 1998;103 mechanisms in shales: prediction and prevention. In: Paper SPE
(B1):651–661. 28851. Presented at the European Petroleum Conference;
Dewhurst DN, Aplin AC, Sarda JP. Influence of clay fraction on October 25–27, 1994. London; 1994.
pore‐scale properties and hydraulic conductivity of experimen­ Ghassemi A, Diek A. Effects of ion transfer on stress and pore
tally compacted mudstones. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 1999;104 pressure distributions around a borehole in shale. In: 38th NARM
(B12):29261–29274. Symposium; Washington, DC: DC Rocks; 2001. pp 85–91.
Dey T, Halleck P. Some aspects of size‐effect in rock failure. Ghorbani A, Zamora M, Cosenza P. Effects of desiccation on the
Geophys Res Lett 1981;8 (7):691–694. elastic wave velocities of clay‐rocks. Int J Rock Mech Mining
Djurhuus J, Aadnoy BS. In situ stress state from inversion of frac­ Sci 2009;46:1267–1272.
turing data from oil wells and borehole image logs. J Petrol Sci Glowka DA. Use of single‐cutter data in the analysis of PDC bit
Eng 2003;38:121−130. designs: Part 1—development of a PDC cutting force model.
Donath FA. Strength variation, deformational behavior of aniso­ J Petrol Technol 1989:41(8):797–799 (844–849).
tropic rocks. In: Judid WR, editor. State of the Earth in the Gray D. Principal stress estimation in shale plays using 3D seismic. In:
Earth’s Crust. New York: Elsevier; 1964. p 281–298. Extended abstract for the GeoCanada 2010 conference “Working
Douglas KJ. The shear strength of rock masses [PhD Dissertation]. with the Earth” March 17, 2010, Montreal, Canada; 2010. 4 pp.
Sydney: The University of New South Wales; 2002. 496 pp. Gregory KB, Vidic RD, Dzombak DA. Water management chal­
Dresen L, Ru¨ter H. Seismic Coal Exploration: Part B: In‐seam lenges associated with the production of shale gas by hydraulic
Seismics. New York: Pergamon; 1994. fracturing. Elements 2011;7 (3):181–186.
Drucker D, Prager W. Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit Hardage BA. Crosswell Seismology and Reverse VSP. London:
design. Appl Mathemat 1952;10:157–65. Geophysical Press; 1992.
Duc MNM. Contribution à l’ étude de la taille des roches [PhD Hartwig A, Könitzer S, Schulz HM, Horsfield B. Investigations
Thesis]. Paris: Universite de Paris VI; 1974. of the shale gas potential in NE Germany [abstract]. In: EGU
Eisner L Zhang Y, Duncan PM, Mueller MC, Thornton MP, Gei D. General Assembly. (Held 19–24 April, 2009 in Vienna, Austria).
Effective VTI anisotropy for consistent monitoring of micro­ Geophysical Research Abstracts 2009;11: EGU2009e8849.
seismic events. The Leading Edge 2011;30(July):772–776. Hawkes I, Mellor M. Uniaxial testing in rock mechanics labora­
Ewy R. Wellbore‐stability predictions by use of a modified Lade tories. Eng Geol 1970;4 (3):177–285.
criterion. SPE Drill Completion 1999;14:85–91. Hay JL, Pharr GM. Instrumented Indentation Testing. ASM
Ewy RT, Stankovich RJ. Pore pressure change due to shale–fluid Handbook. ASM International; 2000. p 232–243.
interaction: measurements under simulated wellbore condi- Helbig K. Foundation of Elastic Anisotropy for Exploration
tions. In: Proceedings of Pacific rocks, Fourth North American Seismics. Amsterdam: Pergamon; 1994.
rock mechanics symposium; July 31–August 3, 2000, Seattle/ Higgins S, Goodwin SS, Donal A. Anisotropic stress models
Rotterdam: Balkema; 2000. p 147–54. improve completion design in the Baxter shale. In: SPE Annual
Fairhurst C. On the validity of the Brazilian test for brittle materials. Technical Conference and Exhibition, 21–24 September,
Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 1964;1:515–46. Denver, CO, USA, SPE 115736; 2008.