Page 209 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 209
REFERENCES 189
development, North Sea. In: Paper SPE 84269. Presented at the Thomsen L. Weak elastic anisotropy. Geophysics 1998;51:
2003 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition; October 1954–1966.
5–8, 2003; Denver; 2003. Thuro K, Plinninger RJ, Zah S, Schutz S. Scale effects in rock strength
Russell T, Ewy E, Morton K. Wellbore stability performance of properties. Part 1: Unconfined compressive test and Brazilian test.
water based mud additives, In: SPE Annual technical conference In: Sarkka P, Eloranta P, editors. ISRM Regional Symposium
and Exhibition, 116139, Colorado, USA; September 2008. Eurock 2001; Espoo. Finland/Balkema: ; 2001. p 169–174.
Saroglou H, Tsiambaos G. A modified Hoek–Brown failure crite Tien YM, Kuo MC, Juang CH. An experimental investigation of the
rion for anisotropic intact rock. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci failure mechanism of simulated transversely isotropic rocks. Int
2008;45:223–234. J Rock Mech Mining Sci 2006;43:1163–1181.
Sarout J, Detournay E. Chemoporoelastic analysis and experimental Tsiambaos G, Sabatakakis N. Considerations on strength of intact
validation of the pore pressure transmission tests for reactive sedimentary rocks. Eng Geol 2004;72 (3–4):261–273.
shales. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 2011;48 (5):759–772. Tsur‐Lavie Y, Denekamp SA. Comparison of size effect for differ
Sarout J, Guéguen Y. Anisotropy of elastic wave velocities in ent types of strength tests. Rock Mech 1982;15 (4):243–254.
deformed shales—part I: experimental results. Geophysics Tsvankin I. Pwave signatures and notation for transversely
2008;73 (5):75–89. isotropic media: An overview. Geophysics 1996;61:467–483.
Sayers CM. Seismic anisotropy of shake. Geophys Prospect Turpening WR, Chon YT, Peper REF, Szerbiak R, Schultz T,
2005;53:667–676. Thielmier G, Ballard R. Detection of bed continuity using
Schlemmer R, Friedheim JE, Growcock FB, Bloys JB, Headlley crosswell data: Gypsy pilot site study. In: Proceedings of the
JA, Polnaszek SC. Membrane efficiency in shale—an empirical Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Geology. SPE Annual
evaluation of drilling fluid chemistries and implications for Technical Conference and Exhibition, 4–7 October, Washington,
fluid design. In: SPE 74557. Presented at IADC/SPE drilling DC, SPE 24710; 1992. pp 503–512.
conference; February 26–28, 2002; Dallas; 2002. Ulm F, James S. The scratch test for strength and fracture toughness
Sheorey PR, Biswas AK, Choubey VD. An empirical failure criterion determination of oil well cements cured at high temperature and
for rocks and jointed rock masses. Eng Geol 1989;26:141–159. pressure. Cement Concrete Res 2011;41:942–946.
Sherwood JD. Biot poroelasticity of a chemically active shale. Proc Ulusay R, Hudson JA. The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for
Rock Soc Lond 1993;440:365–377. Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 1974–2006.
Sherwood JD, Bailey L. Swelling of shale around a cylindrical London: International Society for Rock Mechanics; 2007.
wellbore In: Proceeding Rock Society of London 1994; A 444: Van Oort E. Physical‐chemical stabilization of shales. In: Paper
161–184. SPE37263. SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry;
Singh J, Ramamurthy T, Rao GV. Strength anisotropies in rocks. February 18–21, 1997; Houston, TX, USA; 1997.
Indian Geotech 1989;19:147–166. Van Oort E, Hale AH, Mody FK. Manipulation of coupled osmotic
Single B, Goel RK, Mehrotra VK, Garg SK, Allu MR. Effect of flows for stabilization of shales exposed to water‐based drilling
intermediate principal stress on strength of anisotropic rock mass. fluids. In: SPE 30499. Presented at SPE annual technical
Tunneling Underground Space Technol 1998;13 (1):71–79. conference exhibition; October 22–25, 1995; Dallas, TX, USA;
Skelton J, Hogg TW, Cross R, Verheggen L. Case history of direc 1995.
tional drilling in the cusiana field in Colombia. In: Paper IADC/ Van Oort E, Hale AH, Mody FK, Roy R. Transport in shales and
SPE 29380. Presented at the 1995 IADC/SPE Drilling design of improved water‐based shale drilling fluids. SPE Drill
Conference; February 28–March 2, 1995; Amsterdam, The Completion 1996;11 (3):137–146.
Netherlands; 1995. Van Oort E, Nicholson J, D’Agostino J. Integrated borehole insta
Slater CP. Estimation and modeling of anisotropy in vertical and bility studies: Key to drilling at the technical limit and Trouble
walkaway seismic profiles at two North Caucasus oil field [PhD Cost reduction. In: Presented at the SPE/IADC Drilling
Thesis]. Edinburgh University; 1997. Conference, 27 February–1 March, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;
Song I, Haimson BC. Polyaxial strength criteria and their use in SPE/IADC 67763; 2001.
estimating in situ stress magnitudes from borehole breakout Vernik L, Zoback MD. Estimation of maximum horizontal principal
dimensions. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 1997;34 (3–4):498. stress magnitude from stress‐induced well bore breakouts in the
Szwedzicki T. Indentation hardness testing of rock. Int J Rock Cajon Pass scientific research borehole. J Geophys Res 1992;97
Mech Mining Sci 1998;35 (6):825–829. (B4):5109–5119.
Tare UA, Mese AI, Mody FK. Interpretation and application of Wawersik WR, Fairhurst C. A study of brittle rock fracture in labo
acoustic and transient pressure response to enhance shale insta ratory compression experiments. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci
bility predictions. In: SPE 63052. Presented at SPE annual Geomech Abs 1970;7 (5):561–564.
technical conference and exhibition; October 1–4, 2000; Dallas, White JE, Martineau‐Nicoletis L, Monash C. Measured anisotropy
TX, USA; 2000. in Pierre Shale. Geophys Prospect 1983;31:709–725.
Tavallali A, Vervoort A. Effect of layer orientation on the failure of Wiebols G, Cook N. An energy criterion for the strength of rock in
layered sandstone under Brazilian test conditions. Int J Rock polyaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 1968;5:
Mech Mining Sci 2010;47:313–322. 529–549.
