Page 213 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 213

ORGANIC MATTER EFFECTS ON ELASTIC PROPERTIES  193
            TABLE 9.1  Shales used in this study

                                                                      Maturity Indicators
            Shale and Basin (number of samples)  Saturation  TOC, wt%  HI      R , %     References
                                                                                0
            Bakken Formation, Mississippian‐  Preserved from major   5.9 ÷ 20.1  97 ÷ 584  0.61 ÷ 1.27  Vernik and Landis (1996);
              Devonian, Williston Basin (15)  desiccation                                  Vernik and Liu (1997)
            Bazhenov Formation, Jurassic,   Preserved from major   2.2 ÷ 7.4  200 ÷ 434  0.6 ÷ 0.78  Vernik and Landis (1996);
              Western Siberia (8)          desiccation                                     Vernik and Liu (1997)
            Monterey Formation, Miocene,    Preserved from major   0.2 ÷ 18.2  316 ÷ 692  0.38 ÷ 0.5  Vernik and Landis (1996);
              Santa Barbara, and Santa Maria   desiccation                                 Vernik and Liu (1997)
              Basins (18)
            Niobrara Formation, Cretaceous,    Preserved from major   0.5 ÷ 2.1  7 ÷ 124  0.81 ÷ 1.46  Vernik and Landis (1996);
              San Juan Basin (10)          desiccation                                     Vernik and Liu (1997)
            Kimmeridge Shale, North Sea (5)  Preserved from major   2.0 ÷ 8.6  65 ÷ 499  0.42 ÷ 1.25  Vernik and Landis (1996);
                                           desiccation                                     Vernik and Liu (1997)
            Japan Tertiary (1)            Preserved from major   2.1  438                Vernik and Landis (1996);
                                           desiccation                                     Vernik and Liu (1997)
            Lockatong Formation, Triassic,   Preserved from major   0 ÷ 2.8  1 ÷ 4  2.58 ÷ 3.15  Vernik and Landis (1996);
              Newark Basin (7)             desiccation                                     Vernik and Liu (1997)
            Woodford Formation, Mississippian–  Preserved from major   2.3 ÷ 9.5  40 ÷ 634  0.46 ÷ 1.47  Vernik and Landis (1996);
              Devonian, Anadarko Basin (6)  desiccation                                    Vernik and Liu (1997)
            Wolfcamp Formation, Permian,                    1.2 ÷ 3.6  179               Bocangel et al. (2013)
              Midland Basin (9)
            Jurassic Shale (1)            Saturated, drained                             Hornby (1998)
            Kimmeridge Shale (1)          Saturated, drained                             Hornby (1998)
            Chattanooga, Devonian–        Dry                                            Johnston and Christensen (1995)
              Mississippian, eastern
              Tennessee (2)
            New Albany , Devonian–        Dry                                            Johnston and Christensen (1995)
              Mississippian, Illinois
              Basin (4)
            Lower Antrim, Devonian–       Dry                                            Johnston and Christensen (1995)
              Mississippian, Michigan
              Basin (1)
            Mannville (4)                 Dry                                            Hemsing (2007)
            Officer Basin (3)             Saturated, undrained  0.0                      Dewhurst et al. (2008)
            Bass Basin (2)                Saturated, undrained  <1.0                     Dewhurst et al. (2008)
            Africa Shale (5)              Saturated, undrained                           Wang (2002)
            North Sea Shale (3)           Saturated, undrained                           Wang (2002)
            Gulf Coast Shale (1)          Saturated, undrained                           Wang (2002)
            Hard Shale (5)                Saturated, undrained                           Wang (2002)
            Siliceous Shale (2)           Saturated, undrained                           Wang (2002)
            Mancos Shale,                 Dry               1.0                          Patrusheva et al. (2014)
            Cretaceous (4)



            kerogen and shale elastic moduli exhibit significantly strong   Taking into account a strong alignment of illite and ker­
            contrast. Consequently, to answer the question of the ker­  ogen observed on SEM images, Vernik and Nur (1992) sug­
            ogen  effects  on  elastic  properties  of  ORSs,  we  have  to   gested using Backus averaging for a 1D‐layered medium
            assume some microstructure of organic and inorganic con­  (Backus, 1962) to model elastic moduli of ORSs as follows:
            stituents. As the microstructure of the organic and inorganic
            constituents of ORSs depends on many factors such as   c *  c   cc  1  c  1  1  c c  2  c ;  *  c  1  1  ;
                                                                             2
                                                                                           1
            depositional environment, compaction diagenesis, inorganic   11  11  1 13 33  33  33 13  1  33  33
                                                                                                   1
                                                                                       *
            matrix mineralogy, and organic matter maturity, the micro­    c * 44  c 44 1 1  ;c * 66  c 66  ;c 13  c 33 1  cc    (9.1)
                                                                                                  33 13
            structure of the constituents will probably change from shale
            to shale and the models should be chosen with respect to this   Here, the brackets indicate an average value of parameter,
            microstructure.                                      weighted by volume fractions of the constituents. Elastic
   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218