Page 71 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 71

SAMPLE TYPE AND QUALITY   51
            to  volatilization  and  evaporation  of  hydrocarbons  during   Rock‐Eval 6 instruments have 25–35% lower free‐oil
            drilling operations, sample retrieval, handling, storage, and   yields  as shown by the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate
            sample preparation prior to analysis.                (NIGOGA, 2000). The organic carbon dioxide (S3) released
                                                                 from kerogen is about the same in all samples.  While it
                                                                 might be inferred that there was a difference in organofacies
            3.4  SAMPLE TYPE AND QUALITY                         between the wells, the projected HI values from a linear fit
                                                                 of pyrolysis yields (S2) to TOC was 430 and 423 mg/g TOC,
            Oftentimes, geochemical reconnaissance work is completed   respectively, suggesting no organofacies differences. As sug­
            on archived cuttings that have been stored for years to   gested earlier, the source of difference may be the result of
            decades. Core is sometimes available, but in the past cores   oxidation of the old samples as the carbonate carbon yields
            were seldom taken in shales. Comparison of archived cut­  increased by a factor of 3. Although the flame ionization
            tings to fresh cuttings and core often show lower values in   detector (FID) does not respond to carbon dioxide, it is likely
            basic geochemical measurements such as TOC, Rock‐Eval,   that the increase in nonhydrocarbon gases such as carbon
            and vitrinite reflectance for the older samples (Jarvie et al.,   dioxide released into the S2 effluent during pyrolysis dilutes,
            2007; Steward, 2007). This was noted in Barnett Shale wells   and thereby reduces the FID response in the old cuttings. In
            drilled by Mitchell Energy & Development Corp. (MEDC)   other work, highly weathered outcrop samples may cause
            when wells were offset and cored (Steward, 2007).    the FID flame to be extinguished.
              In 2011, an independent oil company, Gunn Oil Co.,   Other data published by the Arkansas Geological Survey
            drilled a well in Fisher County,  Texas, that offset a well   shows that cuttings data on the Fayetteville Shale often
            drilled in the 1980s, both of which penetrated Pennsylvanian   reflect a mixture of overlying organic lean rock (cavings)
            period shales. A comparison of fresh core and cuttings to the   with Fayetteville Shale. Values typical of the Fayetteville
            archived cuttings shows significant changes in geochemical   Shale are often reached about 30–50 ft into the shale (Li
            results (Fig. 3.3). In Figure 3.3, inorganic carbonate carbon   et al., 2010). The opposite trend carries through the base
            (CC) is higher in the older samples suggesting oxidation.   of the Fayetteville Shale into underlying organic lean inter­
            TOC, free‐oil yield (S1), and pyrolysis yield (S2) are all   vals that gradually decrease after about 30–50 ft out of the
              significantly higher in the fresh samples compared to   shale.  These are not errors in formation tops but rather
            the 20‐year‐old cuttings. Note that oil yields (S1) may be     cavings of overlying sediments thereby affecting the geo­
            lower depending on pyrolysis instrumentation, for example,   chemical results.



                                25.00                                   20.68     Fresh RSWC
                              Value (wt.%, mg oil/g rock, or mg CO 2 /g rock)  15.00  6.24 9.58 17.60  5.43  5.75  12.42
                                                                                  Fresh cuttings
                                                                                  Old cuttings
                                20.00






                                10.00
                                                                              7.45

                                 5.00


                                 0.00                4.57 3.04  3.61 1.05          0.27 0.44 0.38
                                       Carbonate  TOC (wt.%)    S1         S2           S3
                                      carbon (wt.%)        (mg oil/g rock) (mg oil/g rock) (mg CO /g rock)
                                                                                         2
                                                             Measurement
            FIGURE 3.3  When fresh rotary sidewall core (RSWC) and cuttings are compared in source rock intervals, RSWC TOC values are higher
            likely due to dilution of the cuttings as part of the drilling process, generally over 10 ft intervals, and variability in TOC over the cuttings
            interval. When 20‐year old cuttings are compared to fresh cuttings and fresh RSWC TOC values, both in the corresponding source rock unit,
            the TOC is higher in fresh samples.
   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76