Page 286 - Fundamentals of Magnetic Thermonuclear Reactor Design
P. 286

Plasma Control System  Chapter | 8    265


             alised gain matrix of the ‘external input disturbances d − generalised output
             vector e’ loop. As external disturbances lead to deviation of the plasma’s dy-
             namic parameters from their equilibrium values, the stabilisation effectiveness
             depends on how well the control system suppresses them. The lower the H(s, K)
             gain matrix the higher the stabilisation effectiveness.
                In this connection, it makes sense to solve a problem of the maximum
             degree of suppression of external disturbances through minimisation of the
             H(s,K) gain matrix by optimal choice of transfer matrix of the K(s) control-
             ler. To accomplish this, it is necessary to formalise the requirement that the
             H(s, K) transfer matrix should be ‘small.’ To this end, we can use a matrix
                     (
             norm  Hs,K)  as a functional to be minimised. Then, a generalised prob-                                   Hs,K
             lem of the maximum degree of suppression of external disturbances may be
             expressed as

                                            (
                                     ()
                                 I= IK =H s,K) →     inf,              (8.36)                                       I=IK=Hs,K→infK∈Ω,
                                                    K∈Ω
             where Ω is an ensemble of transfer matrices with rational fraction components,
             for which the characteristic polynomial of the (8.33), (8.35) closed-loop system
             is unambiguously Hurwitzian.
                The choice of specific norm in Eq. (8.36) is associated with different classes
             of problems dealing with the optimised synthesis of a stabilising controller. Cur-
             rently, problems that have to be dealt with most often include the following [6]:

             l     H  2  norm minimisation problem (typically represented by the LQG-                             H 2
                optimal synthesis problem),
             l     H  ∞  norm minimisation problem (the H -optimal synthesis problem), and                        H∞
                                                ∞
             l  the problem of minimisation of the first two norms for ‘weighted’ transfer
                matrices HS , where S (s) is a given weighted matrix function; examples in-
                         1
                                  1
                clude root mean square optimal synthesis problems and ensuring controller
                synthesis problems.
                Going forward, we assume that all the roots of the characteristic polynomial
             of the closed-loop system, mathematically expressed by Eqs (8.33) and (8.35),
             lie in the open left semiplane. We also assume that for all transfer matrices,
                                         
                                              −
                                            T
             H(s), discussed later, expression trH ( ) ()is a proper rational fraction.                               trHT−sHs
                                               sH s
                                                     
                                         
             Then, the given norms are introduced through
             l  norm  H :                                                                                           H 2
                        2
                                    1   ∞
                                           
                                                           ω
                                             T
                            H  2  =  2π  ∫ −∞ tr H (− jω) (   d .     (8.37)                                       H =12π∫−∞∞trHT−jwHjwdw.
                                                    Hjω) 
                                           
                                                                                                                     2
                For example, for the single-input single-output (SISO) d/e problem
                                         1  ∞       2
                                                      ω
                                                (
                                                                                                                                     2
                                  H  2  =  2  ∫ −∞  Hjω)  d ;          (8.38)                                       H =12π∫−∞∞Hjw  dw;
                                                                                                                      2
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291