Page 41 - Fundamentals of Magnetic Thermonuclear Reactor Design
P. 41

Facilities With Magnetic Plasma Confinement  Chapter | 2    23


             l  Physical parameters (T, k, Z , ∆t burn ) that can only be achieved if necessary
                                      eff
                technical solutions come up.
             l  Engineering parameters (such as the neutron fluence Fl and the ∆ PL–TF  gap).
                Let us review the status of fusion research. Although impressive normalised
             beta values (β  ≈ 6) and very good plasma confinement results (H  ≈ 2) have
                                                                  y,2
                        N
             been achieved in some tokamak experiments, they cannot be sustained for an
             extended time. Achievements reached with long facility operation are relatively
             modest. According to Tomassen [17], the product β ·H  falls when the ratio
                                                       N
                                                          y,2
             ∆t burn /τ  increases.
                   E
                The later investigations [18,19] allow to obtain the limitation for the combi-
             nation β ·H /q 95 2  for the long-time pulses. Maximum values of H  decreased
                      y,2
                                                                  y,2
                    N
             for high values of plasma density (near Greenwald limit) [19].
                As one can see from Table 2.5, only ITER и DEMO-S can comply with the
             β ·H  ≤ 3.5–4 requirement. Hence, another requirement, β ·H  > 4–6, be-
                                                              N
                                                                 y,2
                 y,2
              N
             comes an objective, and searching for suitable operating modes should be one
             of the ITER physicists’ priorities.
                Different additional plasma heating systems are employed to heat plasma to
             the required T ≥ 10 keV. A considerably elongated plasma (with k ≥ 1.7–1.9),
             which modern fusion machines are designed to run, is vertically unstable, and a
             computerised system is needed to control its steady burning, position and shape.
             To reduce radiation losses, the plasma effective charge (Z ) must be kept as
                                                            eff
             close to 1 as possible. Generally, Z  is designed to be less than or equal to 1.7.
                                         eff
             To this end, special technologies are used to condition the walls of the discharge
             and the divertor chambers.
                In addition, oil-free vacuum pumping systems and engineering design meth-
             ods for reducing the density of heat and corpuscular fluxes carried onto the first
             wall are employed.
                A quasi-steady state discharge mode can be obtained, if a poloidal magnetic
             flux has sufficient margin. However, a radical way to move to a steady-state
             mode is through a non-inductive discharge current drive.
             2.5  ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS TO MAIN FUNCTIONAL
             SYSTEMS

             2.5.1  Magnet System
             The amplitude of the toroidal magnetic field on the coil (B ) is ∼12 Т in the
                                                             tc
             ITER reactor and may reach 14–16 Т in the DEMO and FPP machines. Such
             field magnitudes make resistive coils impracticable because of too large cooling
             power values. As a result, superconducting coils are proposed for the discussed
             projects. The same is true for the central solenoid with magnetic field amplitude
             of ≤13 T. The magnetic field flux capacity ∆Ψ , required to maintain the induc-
                                                  cs
             tive discharge scenario, is secured through the selection of the central solenoid’s
             appropriate mean radius R  and appropriate in-solenoid field B  according to [3]
                                  cs
                                                              cs
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46