Page 297 - Fundamentals of Ocean Renewable Energy Generating Electricity From The Sea
P. 297

Other Aspects of Ocean Renewable Energy Chapter | 10 283


             of Fundy is in resonance at the semidiurnal frequency, and so the water depth
             (in comparison to the channel length) is expected to be sensitive to changes in
             mean sea level—see Section 3.5. Pelling and Green [20] simulated the response
             in tidal dynamics that a 1 m SLR would have in this region. This 1 m SLR led
             to an increase in the M2 tidal amplitude of around 0.1 m throughout the Bay of
             Fundy, and this is attributed to the basin approaching true resonance as sea level
             (i.e. the mean water depth in the basin) increases. In a study of the northwest
             European shelf seas, 1 m of SLR led to significant changes in the tidal dynamics
             [21]. Again, in regions that are in resonance such as the northern Irish Sea,
             tidal amplitude increased (by around 0.05 m), but there were many regions that
             reduced in amplitude, and one important region is the Bristol Channel (which
             hosts Swansea Bay—proposed location of a tidal lagoon power plant), where
             the M2 amplitude reduced by around 0.05 m. The M2 amplitude in Swansea Bay
             is around 3 m (Fig. 3.6). Since theoretical tidal range power is related to tidal
             range squared (e.g. Section 3.14), a reduction of 0.05 m in the M2 amplitude
             would therefore represent a 3% reduction in the mean tidal range resource.
                Finally, although the IPCC AR5 is a highly respected source of projected
             SLR, there are other studies that consider the possibility of even greater SLR
             by the end of the century. It is useful to consider more extreme future scenarios
             since, although they are highly unlikely to occur, they are associated with very
             high levels of impact. The UK Met Office UKCP09 includes a high-plus-plus
             (H++) scenario, that is associated with SLR of up to 1.9 m by 2100. The
             response of the M2 amplitude across the world’s oceans to an SLR of such
             magnitude is plotted in Fig. 10.8 [22], demonstrating a complex pattern of
             significant regional increases/decreases in the tidal range resource. For example,
             the changes in the Irish Sea discussed earlier are further amplified under such
             a scenario, and there is a significant reduction in the tidal range resource in
             the Gulf of St Malo (where La Rance barrage is situated)—see Pickering et al.
             [22] (which is open access) for more details, including a consideration of the
             additional tidal constituents S2, K1, and O1.

             Tidal Stream
             There are surprisingly few published studies that investigate how the tidal stream
             resource is likely to vary in the future. In an appendix included in Pickering
             et al. [22], it is noted that Manning’s equation expresses the depth-averaged
             velocity as a function of the square root of the hydraulic slope, and so a 10%
             change in elevation amplitude would result in ∼3% change in current amplitude.
             Under a scenario of 1 m SLR, a typical change in M2 elevation amplitude of
             0.1 m was reported in the previous section for the Bay of Fundy (where the
             typical M2 elevation amplitude is in the range 2–5 m [20]), and this equates to a
             2–5% change in tidal elevation. Therefore, currents in the Bay of Fundy would
             change by 1.4–2.2% which, for a typical M2 current amplitude of 1 m/s would
             lead to an increase in current speed of 1.4–2.2 cm/s. This change is likely to be
             within the bounds of natural variability (e.g. consideration of nonastronomical
   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302