Page 133 - Fundamentals of Physical Volcanology
P. 133

9780632054435_4_008.qxd  12/10/2007  12:29PM  Page 110





                    110  CHAPTER 8



                  tion. These are usually called lithic clasts, and are  average grain size increases upward the deposit is
                  far less likely to break on landing than fragile pieces  inversely graded. Grading can occur for two rea-
                  of pumice. Although at any one site the lithic clasts  sons. First, the wind speed may change during an
                  are generally smaller than the lower density pumice  eruption. An increase in wind speed will carry all
                  clasts (recall from eqn 8.1 that it is (dσ), the prod-  clasts further from the vent, so at any one location
                  uct of size and density, that controls where clasts  increasingly larger clasts will be deposited with
                  land), it is common to find that, near the vent, the  time and inverse grading will develop. Second,
                  value of (dσ) for the largest lithic clast is greater  there may be a change in the mass flux of the
                  than the values from any of the pumices, due to  eruption. An increase in mass flux causes an increase
                  pumice breakage, and it is this largest value of (dσ)  in the eruption cloud height (see eqn 6.7) and this
                  that is used in any analysis of the deposit.  too causes the dispersal of clasts of a given size to
                  • The thickness of the deposit progressively  increase with time and so leads to inverse vertical
                  decreases with distance from the vent. While this   grading. Both of these processes will act over most
                  is generally true there are exceptions. Thus, if the  or all of a deposit. However, local grading can occur
                  deposit accumulates on a steep slope (greater than  in regions of slumping on steep slopes due to the
                  ∼30°) slumping may occur; and at any location  differential movement of clasts of differing sizes.
                  there may be erosion of the deposit by nonvolcanic
                  processes after it is emplaced. Furthermore, soil
                                                              8.3 The application of eruption
                  formation by weathering can change the thickness
                                                              column models
                  of a deposit. There may also be effects related to the
                  dynamics of the eruption itself. Thus, if there is an
                  unusually large proportion of medium-sized pyro-  A model is of value only if it actually reproduces
                  clasts leaving the vent, relative to the larger and  behaviors that we see in reality. Theoretical erup-
                  smaller sizes, these will fall mainly at intermedi-  tion models predict how pyroclast dispersal is
                  ate distances from the vent, and so a situation may  related to the eruption conditions and the atmo-
                  occur where the downwind thickness of the deposit  spheric conditions. Since the development of mod-
                  increases away from the vent for some distance  els of this kind in the 1970s and 1980s there have
                  before eventually decreasing in the more common  been several well-observed eruptions for which
                  way. Another complication can occur when an erup-  the models have been shown to work quite well,
                  tion column contains a lot of condensing water  certainly well enough to justify their use in diagnos-

                  vapor, perhaps because the eruption occurs during  ing conditions during ancient eruptions whose
                  a rain storm so that both air and water droplets are  products are preserved. For prehistoric eruptions,
                  being entrained in the gas-thrust region. When this  which include the largest eruptions in the geolo-
                  happens, a water film forms on the small pyroclasts  gical record, events vastly greater than anything
                  and they can stick together progressively to form  experienced thus far by humans (see Chapter 10),
                  larger aggregates called ash clusters or ash pel-  such techniques provide us with the only way of
                  lets. In dry eruption clouds, frictional effects can  determining the mass fluxes and eruption cloud
                  cause particles to become electrostatically charged,  heights. This is very important in assessing the
                  and this too can cause aggregates to form. Being  possible hazards presented by active volcanoes
                  larger, aggregates fall to the ground faster than the  that have little or no historical record of eruption
                  small clasts forming them would have done, and  (see Chapter 11). Modeling has also enabled vol-
                  again this can cause unusual patterns in the thick-  canologists to develop a long-term view of the
                  ness of the deposit.                        effects that large eruptions might have had in the
                  • A deposit may exhibit vertical  grading. This  past and could have in the future on our climate
                  means that the range of grain sizes at any given loca-  and environment. This issue is discussed further
                  tion in the deposit changes with height in the  in Chapter 12.
                  deposit. If the average grain size decreases upward  Both the testing and the application of the
                  in the deposit this is called normal grading; if the  models require the same steps to be taken: the fall
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138