Page 264 - Fundamentals of The Finite Element Method for Heat and Fluid Flow
P. 264

256
                                       245
                                       220                        CONVECTION IN POROUS MEDIA
                                      Nusselt number  195
                                       170
                                       145

                                       120
                                         100  125  150  175  200  225  250  275  300  325  350
                                                          Reynolds number

                        Figure 8.5 Forced convection in a channel. Comparison of the Nusselt number with exper-
                        imental data for different particle Reynolds numbers. Points—experimental (Vafai et al.
                        1984); dashed line—numerical (Vafai et al. 1984); solid—CBS

                        the inlet width. Zero pressure conditions are assumed at the exit. The inlet velocity profile
                        is parabolic and no-slip boundary conditions apply on the solid side walls. Both the walls
                        are assumed to be at a higher, uniform temperature than that of the inlet fluid temperature.
                        The analysis is carried out for different particle Reynolds numbers ranging from 150 to 350.
                        The quasi-implicit (QI) scheme with θ = 1, θ 1 = 0and θ 2 = θ 3 = 1 has been employed
                        to solve this problem. A non-uniform mesh with triangular elements was also used in the
                        analysis. The mesh is fine close to the walls, and coarse towards the centre. The total
                        number of nodes and elements used in the calculation are 3003 and 5776 respectively.
                           Figure 8.5 shows a comparison of the calculated steady state average Nusselt number
                        distribution on a hot wall with the available experimental and numerical data. The Nusselt
                        number is calculated as
                                                        hL      L  ∂T
                                                  Nu =     =         dx                     (8.74)
                                                         k    0 ∂x 1
                           Figure 8.6 shows the difference between the generalized model and the Brinkman and
                        Forchheimer extensions for the velocity profiles close to the wall in a variable porosity
                        medium at steady state. As may be seen, the Forchheimer and Brinkman extensions fail to
                        predict the channelling effect close to the wall. While the Brinkman extension is insensitive
                        to porosity values, the Forchheimer model does not predict the viscous effect close to the
                        channel walls.



                        8.6 Natural Convection
                        The fluid flow in a variable porosity medium within an enclosed cavity, under the influence
                        of buoyancy, is another interesting and difficult problem to analyse. In order to study such
                        a problem, an enclosure packed with a fluid-saturated porous medium is considered. The
                        aspect ratio of the enclosure is 10 (ratio between height and width). All the enclosure
                        walls are subjected to ‘no-slip’ boundary conditions. The left vertical wall is assumed to
                        be at a higher, uniform temperature than that of the right side wall. Both the horizontal
   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269