Page 358 - Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes : Physical, Chemical, and Biological
P. 358

Flocculation                                                                                     313



                                                               11.5.3 PLANT DESIGN
                                                               While unit processes are the foci of any plant design, a host of
                                                               other considerations are necessary to support any process
                                                               functioning. The layout of the overall plan showing all unit
                                                               processes as they are integrated as a system is the first task.
                                                               Other tasks required include the sizing of pipes, motors,
                                                               meters, etc.; selection of materials for pipes, paddle wheels,
                                                               walls; locations of pipes and valves; and methods of adjust-
                                                               ment for paddle-wheel rotational velocity. How all of this
                                                               fits together is shown in drawings with specifications giving
                                                               supplemental details. A modern adjunct to traditional draw-
                                                               ings is an animation derived from the drawings by means of
                                                               software.
                                                                  Figure CD11.17a and b are excerpts from ‘‘walk-through’’
                                                               animations illustrating the design for the Floc-Sed basin 2000
            FIGURE 11.14 Flocculation basin for 76 L=min (20 gpm) pilot  addition to the Fort Collins WTP. The animation starts with a
            plant at Engineering Research Center, Colorado State University,  view seen upon entering the building. The plant addition has
            Fort Collins, CO.                                  two identical parallel treatment trains, each with a four-com-
                                                               partment flocculation basin; the flow leaves the fourth basin
                                                               and then to an assembly of Lamella plate settlers on the east
                 given in Rushton’s work (see Section 10.3.3.3). The  side of the building. The first view is from the northwest
                 power number is affected by Reynolds number as a  corner looking south along the west side of the building and
                                                      5
                 straight-line relationship in the range, R < 10 , and  along the first compartments of both trains. Walking south, a
                                             1
                         5
                 for R > 10 , P   4.1. If G   100 s , as in the first  left turn is made heading east between the two trains. The
                                  5
                 compartment, R   10 , which is in the turbulent  plate settler basins are encountered at the end of the floc basin.
                                 1
                 range. If G   15 s , as in the third compartment,  Walking to the east side of the building and then south along
                 R   20,000, which is in the laminar range and  the plate settler basin, the tops of the plates are seen to the
                 Camp’s equation (10.5) G ¼ [P=mV] 0.5  applies, i.e.,  right. Walking around the assembly gives a more detailed
                 with m in the denominator.                    view of the third compartment of the flocculation basin. The
              .  Figure 11.15d shows shaft power versus rotational  serpentine path from one compartment to another is clearly
                 velocity of the shaft. As seen, the curve shows  visible at this point. Also, the detail of the number of arms for
                 an exponential rise in power with rpm with    each paddle wheel may be seen, i.e., compartments #1 and #2
                 exponent ¼ 2.26. The power required for a given  paddles each have three arms while compartments #3 and #4
                 shaft rotational velocity can be obtained. For n ¼ 12  each have two. The separation walls between each compart-
                 rpm, for example, P   10 W (0.013 hp).        ment are only to channel the water flow and are made of
              . The plots shown in Figure 11.15 apply only for the  redwood. Figure CD11.17b (animation) starts at the same
                 system tested. The nature of the relationships shown,  place but the walk leads down the stairs to the lower level
                 however, and their general shapes should apply to  where a pipe gallery and paddle-wheel motors are seen; the
                 any other system.                             motors are larger in size as the walk moves from compartment
                                                               #4 toward compartment #1. Turning the corner, the main pipe
            11.5.2.3  Slip Factor                              gallery is seen with large pipes that deliver coagulated water
                                                               to each of the floc basins.
            Table CD11.8 shows the application of Equation 11.19 to the
                                                                  As stated previously, design walk-through animations are
            data of Table CD11.7 to give k, i.e., the ‘‘slip factor,’’ values
                                                               software derivatives of the traditional engineering drawings
            for different rotational velocities. Figure 11.16 is a plot of the
                                                               as done by drawing software (such as AutoCade). They
            data showing k versus rpm as a linear relation, i.e.,
                                                               provide a means to visualize the project as constructed,
                                                               which permits inspection and perhaps modifications. The
                          k ¼ 0:074 þ 0:007   rpm      (11:27)
                                                               animation permits ‘‘seeing’’ in places difficult to visualize
                                                               by drawings alone. For example, at about 0.45 completion
            The intercept (0.074) and slope (0.007) may differ from one  of (b), a recessed space with sludge drain pipes is seen, which
            system to another, but the Equation 11.27 form should be true  is difficult to visualize from the traditional drawings. The
            regardless of the system (such as model or full scale). If a slip  pseudo walk through lets the designer determine whether,
            factor is selected for a design that lacks empirical data, then  for example, pipes are crossing paths of one another at some
            Camp’s slip factor, i.e., 0.24 < k < 0.32 gives a reasonable  point, whether the overall layout is reasonable, and whether
            estimate; for reference, the k values in Table CD11.8 are  the plant seems operable. These same points are of interest to
            within the same range.                             the persons in operation.
   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363