Page 19 - Gas Purification 5E
P. 19

Introduction   9


                                                Table 1-4
                                         Relative Costs of Columns

                   Relative Costs of Tray Columns (for equal diameter and height)

                                        Bubble Cap          1 .oo
                                        Koch Kascade        1.243
                                        Plate Tmy           0.842
                                        Sieve Tray          0.874
                                        Turbogrid           0.855
                                        Valve Tray          0.911
                   Relative Costs of Column Packings (installed cost for equal volumes
                   of packing, Wcu. ft in 1973 dollars)
                                                       1-in. Dia.   2-in. Dia.
                              Berl saddles, stoneware   13.10        -
                              Berl saddles, steel       26.30        -
                              Berl saddles, stainless steel   32.80   -
                              Intalox saddles, ceramic   13.30      10.40
                              Pall rings, polypropylene   36.90     26.30
                              Pall rings, stainless steel   13.60    9.80
                              Raschig rings, stoneware   6.30        4.38
                              Raschig rings, stainless steel   15.70   10.90
                              Raschig rings, steel      12.60        8.79
                              Tellerettes, HD polyethylene   26.30   -
                   Data of Bleckr and Nichols, 1973



                  upward through openings in the tray. After traversing the tray, the liquid flows into a down-
                  comer, which conveys it to the tray below. Downcomers typically occupy 5 to 20% of the
                  column cross-sectional area.
                    In countercurrent trays, which are also available but less popular than crossflow types, the
                  liquid flows from one tray to the next lower tray as free falling drops or streams. Examples
                  of countercurrent trays include perfomted (Dual How), slotted (Turbogrid), and perforated-
                  cormgated (Ripple). The trays are reasonably efficient, but lack flexibility because tray
                  holdup and operating characteristics are highly dependent on gas and liquid flow rates.
                    Baffle or shower deck tray columns also approximate countercurrent contactors. These
                  trays are nonperforated horizontal or slightly sloped sheets, each of which typically occupies
                  slightly more than half of the tower cross-sectional area. The liquid flows off the edge of one
                  tray as a curtain of liquid  or series of  streams and falls through the gas stream to the tray
                  below. Typically, the trays are half moon in shape on alternate sides of the column, or disc
                  and donut designs with centrally located discs that are slightly larger than the openings in
                  donut-shaped trays located above and below them. Baffle trays are used for extremely dirty
                  liquids when highly efficient contact is not required and for heat exchanger duty-particular-
                  ly the quenching of hot, particle-laden gas streams. Photographs of typical commercial trays
                  are shown in Figure 1-2.
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24