Page 23 - Gas Purification 5E
P. 23

Introduction   13

                  O’Connell’s overall tray efficiency correlation (1946), Fair’s flooding correlation for sieve
                  tray columns (1961), Hughmark and O’Connell’s correlation relating to pressure drop of gas
                  through a dry tray (1957), Fair’s correlation for tray weeping (1963), and Eckert’s correlation
                  for flooding in a packed tower (1970A).
                    A number of commercially available software programs that include absorber design rou-
                  tines are listed in the CEP 1997 Software Directoly  (Chem. Eng. Prog., 1997). A packed
                  tower design program for personal computers, which includes correlations for predicting the
                  efficiency and capacity of high efficiency structured packings, is described by  Hausch and
                  Petschauer (1991). Detailed reviews of  commonly used design procedures for absorption
                  operations are presented in several texts and articles including those of Edwards (1984), Fair
                  et al.  (1984), Zenz (1979), Treybal (1980), Kohl (1987);and  Diab and Maddox (1982). A
                  brief summary of the principal design equations and correlations is presented in the follow-
                  ing sections.

                  Material and Energy Balance

                    Figure 1-5  is a simplified diagram of  a countercurrent absorption column containing
                  either trays or packing. In order to work with constant gas and liquid flow rates over the
                  length of the column, solute-free flow rates and mole ratios (rather than mole fractions) are
                  used in material balance equation 1-1.








                                       Lean solvent (absorber)
                                       rich solvent (stripper)









                         G;  Y
                   Gas feed T     ‘ I


                                  1









                                                         Figure 1-5. Material balance diagram
                                                         for Countercurrent contactor.
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28