Page 28 - Gas Purification 5E
P. 28

18    Gas Punifictrtion







                    In equations 1-9 and 1-10, y and x refer to the mole fractions of solute in the gas and liq-
                  uid streams, respectively, and LM  and pM represent the molar values of liquid flow rate and
                   density, Le.,  lb moles/(hr)(sq ft) and lb moledcu ft. The subscript 1 refers to the bottom of
                   the column, subscript 2 to the top of the column, and subscript e to the equilibrium composi-
                   tion with respect to the main body of the other phase. The other symbols have the same sig-
                   nificance as in the previous equations. h general, it is preferable to employ the overall gas-
                   film coefficient  when the gas-film  resistance  is predominant,  and the overall liquid
                   coefficient when the principal resistance to absorption is in the liquid phase.
                    Equations 1-9 and 1-10 may be solved by relatively simple graphical integration. Howev-
                   er, a further simplification, which can fiequently be employed, is the use of  a logarithmic
                   mean driving force in the rate equation rather than graphical integration. This can be shown
                   to be theoretically correct where the equilibrium curve and operating line are. linear over the
                   composition range of the column. The equations then reduce to


                                                                                 (1-11)

                   or





                   where (y - y  h  and (x, - xh~ equal to the logarithmic mean of the driving forces at the
                                           are.
                   top and bottom of the column. Although not thmticdy correct, the logarithmic mean driving
                   force is often used to correlate   values for systems where the equilibrium curve is not a
                   straight line and even for cases of  absorption with chemical reaction. This greatly simplifies
                   data reduction but can lead to Serious errors. In general, the procedure is useful for comparing
                   similar systems within narrow ranges of liquid composition and gas partial pressure.
                     A considerable amount of data on absorption-column performance is presented in terms of
                   the “height of the transfer unit” (HTU), and design procedures based on this concept are pre-
                   ferred by many because of  their simplicity and similarity to plate-column calculation meth-
                   ods. The basic concept which was originally introduced by Chilton and Colburn (1935) is
                   that the calculation of  column height invariably requires the integration of  a relationship
                   such as (from equation 1-9)




                     The dimensionless value obtained from the integration is a measure of the difficulty of the
                   gas-absorption operation. In the above case, it is called the number of transfer units based on
                   an overall gas driving force, NOG, and equation 1-9 can be reduced to

                                                                                 (1-13)
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33