Page 134 - gas transport in porous media
P. 134

Chapter 7: Gas-Phase Dispersion in Porous Media
                                                                                           127
                           the range 8 to 11% (wt) was observed to decrease the effective benzene diffusion
                           coefficient. Similar inverse relationships between soil-water content and diffusion
                           are reported for graded (Taylor, 1949) and aggregated porous media (Millington and
                           Shearer, 1971; Arands et al., 1997). Shimamura (1992) presented similar results for
                           a number of sandy soils with controlled grain-size distributions.
                             Taylor (1949) presented diffusion rates as a function of matric potential, a variable
                           that is inversely related to soil-water content. The plot of effective diffusion distance
                           (inversely proportional to tortuosity) versus matric potential displayed significantly
                           less variability for the four natural and graded porous media studied, as compared to
                           the plot of effective diffusion distance versus soil-water content. Viewing diffusion
                           as a function of matric potential, incorporates both the effects of soil-water content
                           and pore- and grain-size distributions, thereby allowing more general conclusions to
                           be drawn for a variety of porous media.


                           7.3.2 Variables Affecting Mechanical Mixing and
                           Total Dispersion

                           The total magnitude of dispersion depends on several factors, including physical
                           properties of the porous medium, physicochemical properties of the gaseous solute,
                           and flow conditions. Edwards and Richardson (1968) measured dispersion coeffi-
                           cients by varying argon velocity in a dry packed system, demonstrating that the
                           dispersion coefficient is relatively constant at low Reynolds numbers (e.g., 0.01–0.5)
                           and increases approximately linearly for higher Reynolds numbers. The Reynolds
                           number is a measure of the turbulence of flow and for the same fluid and porous
                           medium is directly proportional to average linear velocity. Thus, for the low velocity
                           experiments, the magnitude of dispersion remained relatively constant, but increased
                           linearly at higher velocities. The authors interpret this as indicating that molecular
                           diffusion, a velocity-independent term (see Equation 7.3), dominates dispersion at
                           low velocities (e.g., low Reynolds numbers).At higher velocities, mechanical mixing,
                           which is directly proportional to velocity, dominates dispersion. Using expressions
                           similartoEquation7.3, EdwardsandRichardson(1968)definethreeregionsofdisper-
                           sion: (1) low Reynolds numbers where the mechanical mixing term (in Equation 7.3)
                           is negligible; (2) intermediate Reynolds numbers where both mechanical mixing and
                           diffusion terms are significant; and (3) high Reynolds numbers where the diffusion
                           term becomes negligible. This three-region approach had been previously applied to
                           the case of saturated flow.
                             Popovi˘cová and Brusseau (1997) also examined the role of carrier gas velocity on
                           the magnitude of dispersion and the relative contributions of diffusion and mechan-
                           ical mixing to methane transport in a dry, homogeneous, glass-bead column. At
                           low velocities, virtually all methane dispersion was due to diffusion, while at larger
                           pore velocities, mechanical mixing contributed more than 80% of the observed dis-
                           persion. Similar velocity-dependence of dispersion-contributions was observed for a
                           heterogeneous glass-bead column, and total dispersion increased relative to the homo-
                           geneous system. The heterogeneous column had a macropore located in the center of
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139