Page 259 - Geochemistry of Oil Field Waters
P. 259

RESEARCH STUDIES                                                     243


              Bredehoeft  et al. (1963) developed a mathematical  model to predict the
            distribution  of  ions within  a  formation.  They  assumed  that a  hydrostatic
            head differential opetates between the margin and center of a geologic basin,
            producing  a  water  movement  upward  through  confining low  permeability
            beds.  If  these low permeability  beds contain clay membranes to restrict the
            passage of  ions, the waters on the upflow, or more permeable,  side become
            more  concentrated  in  dissolved  solids.  They  theorized  that  this  process
            produced the concentrated  brines found in the Illinois Basin, and that their
            model  added  weight  to  the  membrane  theory  of  brine  concentration.  A
            major drawback  to the model is the tremendous pressures that are necessary
            to produce a movement of water upward through confining low permeability
            beds.
              Graf  et al.  (1965) found that isotopic fractionation occurred when waters
            passed through shale micropores in the Illinois, Michigan, Alberta, and Gulf
            Coast  Basins. Their  study  did  not yield  sufficient evidence to estimate the
            total fraction of  water movement in the basins subsequent to sediment com-
            paction. The 6 "0 concentrations in brines did not indicate a direct correla-
            tion with ancient oceans.
              A  study of  the 6D and  6l80 in formation waters indicated that the water
            was  predominantly  meteoric,  little  exchange or fractionation had  occurred
            to alter the deuterium, but extensive exchange between  the water and rock
            had altered the oxygen  (Clayton et al.,  1966). They postulated that forma-
            tion  waters in the Gulf Coast  Basin lost their original connate water because
           of  sediment compaction and flushing, and that the present water is meteoric
            water which came in through outcrops.
              This study was good; however, basic studies concerning the fractionation
           and  exchange  of  isotopes between  water,  hydrocarbons,  and rocks need  to
            be made. Results of such studies should enable more positive interpretations.
              A  simplistic model was derived to determine the amounts of  fresh water
           and sea water necessary to create the brine compositions now present in the
           Illinois  and  Michigan  Basins  (Graf  et al.,  1966). The  model  assumes:  (1)
            perfect  efficiency  of  shale  ultrafilters;  (2) complete  bacterial  reduction  of
           sulfate with replacement in solution of  equivalent bicarbonate; (3) complete
           removal  of  bicarbonate  and  equivalent sodium  by  shale ultrafiltration; and
           (4)  magnesium  reaction  with  calcium  carbonate  to  form  dolomite.  The
           dolomitization  reaction  furnished more soluble calcium than  is possible for
           the Illinois Basin, so another calculation was made assuming complete loss of
           magnesium to clay minerals with no return of calcium.
              The  calculations indicated that less fresh water passed through the rocks
           of  the Illinois Basin than those of  the Michigan Basin. These data conflicted
           somewhat  with  Clayton  et al.  (1966) in  that  they  argued  that  the  water
           molecules now in the Illinois Basin originated as fresh water, while the data
           of  Graf  et al. (1966) indicated that too few volumes of  fresh water  passed
           through the Illinois Basin to alter the brine significantly.
              A  study  of  the  hydrodynamics  of  the  Illinois  Basin  indicated  that  in
   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264