Page 245 - Geology of Carbonate Reservoirs
P. 245

226    SUMMARY: GEOLOGY OF CARBONATE RESERVOIRS

               particularly to variations in Mn and Fe. Metallic elements in oxygenated water will
               generally be in oxidized states and less likely to be incorporated in calcite or dolo-
               mite cements that precipitate from those waters. Reducing waters, on the other
               hand, contain reduced metallic cations that are readily incorporated in calcite and
               dolomite lattices so that iron - rich, or ferroan, carbonates can be used as indicators


               of reducing conditions in deeper burial waters. Goldstein ’ s  (1988)  study of cement
               stratigraphy in Pennsylvanian carbonates from New Mexico includes an extensive
               bibliography on cement stratigraphy.

               8.4.2  Field Examples of Diagenetic Reservoirs

                 Nonfractured, diagenetically modified carbonate reservoirs exhibit either hybrid or
               purely diagenetic porosity and account for so many examples that it is beyond the
               scope of this book to review all of them. Also note that the literature does not
               include a category for hybrid pore types. Previously, writers described reservoirs
               with diagenetic, fractured, or  “ primary ”  porosity, if they described the pore system
               characteristics at all. A sampling of the literature reveals the overwhelming number
               of fields that produce from either hybrid or purely diagenetic pore systems. Scott et

               al. ( 1993 ) note that of the 509 giant fields having over 500   MMbbls of oil equivalents,

               59 produce from Cretaceous carbonate reservoirs, including 8 of the 36 supergiant
               fields that alone account for 12.9% of the world ’ s estimated ultimate recoverable


               reserves. Of the 16 Cretaceous carbonate oil and gas fields tabulated by Scott et al.
               ( 1993 ), 13 reservoirs, or 80% of the total number, produce from either moldic or
               vuggy porosity, or both. Scott ’ s description does not give enough information to

               determine how many of those fields produce from hybrids as opposed to purely
               diagenetic porosity. Three of the 16 fields produce at least in part from fracture

               porosity in addition to diagenetically altered porosity. Assuming that these examples
               are reasonably representative of carbonate reservoirs in general, a conservative
               estimate is that 7 - in - 10 carbonate reservoirs produce from strongly altered
               porosity.
                    An extensive compilation of carbonate reservoir case histories by Roehl and
               Choquette ( 1985 ) included a review of the structure, stratigraphy, and reservoir
               characteristics of 35 carbonate reservoirs of different geological ages and locations.
               Of the 35 examples, 8 are described as having depositional porosity with little altera-
               tion except pore space reduction by cementation (hybrid: depositional attributes
               dominant). Nine reservoir examples are interpreted to be largely dependent on
               fracture porosity, and all others exhibit pore systems in which porosity enhancement
               by diagenesis is in those authors ’  words  “ strongly predominant ”  (hybrid: diagenetic
               attributes dominant). Karst and paleocave reservoirs are, in general, classifi ed as
               purely diagenetic and independent of depositional characteristics, although they

               may have been influenced by fractures and joints. Studies by Whitaker and Smart
               ( 1998 ), Purdy and Waltham ( 1999 ), Loucks ( 1999 ), Kosa et al. ( 2003 ), and Loucks
               et al. ( 2004 ) present extensive discussions on the origins and characteristics of karst
               and paleocave reservoirs. Detailed illustrations of paleocaves in the Guadalupe
               Mountains of New Mexico by Kosa et al. ( 2003 ) are instructive because they show
               the scale and complex architecture of paleocaves that developed along syndeposi-
               tional faults. Along the same line, Whitaker and Smart ( 1998 ) describe the hydro-
               logical and diagenetic mechanisms that formed fracture - related caves along the east
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250