Page 242 - Geology of Carbonate Reservoirs
P. 242

DEPOSITIONAL RESERVOIRS   223

                            SC5                                SM1


                                                               8000
                                      SC7

                            8000                             gamma  sonic
                               sonic
                         gamma
                                                                            CAS1
                     N                                                      8000
                                       8000
                         MICROFACIES
                         Crinoid-Bryozoan  gamma  sonic
                         Grainstone-Packstone
                                       RESERVOIR
                         Crinoid-Bryozoan
                         Graistone-Packstone    100  FEET
                         Crinoidal
                         Wackestone-Packstone
                         Crinoidal, Spiculiferous, Silty  0  NO HORIZONTAL SCALE  gamma           sonic
                         Wackstone-mudstone

                    Figure 8.9   A fence diagram showing facies correlation across Conley Field. Reservoir poros-


               ity is limited to the crinoid – bryozoan grainstone and packstone facies shown as a darker
               shade in the panels. Although grainstone facies occur across much of the antecedent high,
               production is from zones with the greatest abundance of bryozoan fragments in proportion
               to crinoidal fragments.
               were those with highest ratios of fenestrate bryozoan fragments to crinoid frag-
               ments. Rocks with high percentages of crinoid fragments were extensively cemented
               by syntaxial overgrowths that nucleated on crinoids and subsequently bridged pores
               to plug pores and pore throats. Rocks composed mainly of fenestrate bryozoan
               fragments retained porosity as intraskeletal pores. The anatomy of bryozoan - rich
               parts of the sand wave complex was determined by creating a fence diagram of the
               Chappel section in the field (Figure  8.9 ). This diagram outlines the productive and

               non productive zones in the field.



                  The Geological Concept   Conley Field was found because it is easily identifi ed by
               seismic surveys as a present structural anomaly. In the Hardeman Basin of North
               Texas, many structural anomalies are present in the Chappel Limestone interval,
               but only a few of them have reservoir porosity. In many cases the reservoirs produce
               from fractures and to a lesser extent from matrix porosity. At Conley Field, however,

               reservoir porosity is confined to bryozoan – crinoid grainstones that accumulated
               much like the oolites and rhodolites at North Haynesville Field in the previous
               example. The porosity is intra -  and interparticle porosity in bioclastic grainstones
               and packstones rather than nonskeletal grains that depend largely on in situ chemi-
               cal precipitation for their origin. Interestingly, the Conley reservoir proves that
               skeletal grainstone buildups can occur on antecedent highs just as nonskeletal,
               coated grain buildups do. Finding structural anomalies is relatively easy. Finding
               anomalies with porous and permeable reservoir rocks is not. The main element in
               the geological concept that explains the Conley reservoir is that it became a topo-
               graphic positive, or buildup, during Mississippian time. The thickened Chappel
               Limestone in the field (indicated on geological cross sections and on the interval
   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247