Page 63 - Geometric Modeling and Algebraic Geometry
P. 63

60     P. H. Johansen et al.
                              Recall that an A n singularity is a singularity with normal form x + x + x n+1 ,
                                                                                      2
                                                                                  2
                                                                                  1   2
                                                                                           3
                           see [3, p. 184].
                           Proposition 6. Let f d−1 and f d be as in Definition 2, and assume P =(p 0 : p 1 :
                           p 2 : p 3 )  =(1:0:0:0) is a singular point of Z(F) with I (p 1 :p 2 :p 3 ) (f d−1 ,f d )= m.
                           Then P is an A m−1 singularity.
                           Proof. We may assume that P =(0:0:0:1) and write the local equation
                                                                                  d

                                g := F(x 0 ,x 1 ,x 2 , 1) = x 0 f d−1 (x 1 ,x 2 , 1) + f d (x 1 ,x 2 , 1) =  g i  (4.2)
                                                                                 i=2
                                    ¯
                           with g i ∈ k[x 0 ,x 1 ,x 2 ] homogeneous of degree i. Since Z(f d−1 ) is nonsingular at
                           0:=(0:0:1), we can assume that the linear term of f d−1 (x 1 ,x 2 , 1) is equal to
                           x 1 . The quadratic term g 2 of g is then g 2 = x 0 x 1 + ax + bx 1 x 2 + cx for some
                                                                        2
                                                                                     2
                                                                        1            2
                           a, b, c ∈ k. The Hessian matrix of g evaluated at P is
                                                                      ⎛      ⎞
                                                                       01 0
                                          H(g)(0, 0, 0) = H(g 2 )(0, 0, 0) =  ⎝ 12ab ⎠
                                                                       0 b 2c

                           which has corank 0 when c  =0 and corank 1 when c =0. By [3, p. 188], P is an A 1
                           singularity when c  =0 and an A n singularity for some n when c =0.
                              The index n of the singularity is equal to the Milnor number
                                           ¯                         ¯
                                                                                      .
                                                                    k[x 0 ,x 1 ,x 2 ] (x 0 ,x 1 ,x 2 )
                                           k[x 0 ,x 1 ,x 2 ] (x 0 ,x 1 ,x 2 )
                                   µ =dim¯ k                  =dim¯ k
                                                                           ,  ∂x 1  ,  ∂x 2
                                                   J g                  ∂g  ∂g  ∂g
                                                                        ∂x 0
                           We need to show that µ =I 0 (f d−1 ,f d ) − 1. From the definition of the intersection
                           multiplicity, it is not hard to see that
                                                               ¯
                                                                                  .
                                                               k[x 1 ,x 2 ] (x 1 ,x 2 )
                                       I 0 (f d−1 ,f d )=dim¯ k
                                                        (f d−1 (x 1 ,x 2 , 1),f d (x 1 ,x 2 , 1))
                           The singularity at p is isolated, so the Milnor number is finite. Furthermore, since
                           gcd(f d−1 ,f d )=1, the intersection multiplicity is finite. Therefore both dimensions
                           can be calculated in the completion rings. For the rest of the proof we view f d−1
                                                                 ¯
                                                                            ¯
                           and f d as elements of the power series rings k[[x 1 ,x 2 ]] ⊂ k[[x 0 ,x 1 ,x 2 ]], and all
                           calculations are done in these rings.
                              Since Z(f d−1 ) is smooth at O, we can write
                                            f d−1 (x 1 ,x 2 , 1) = (x 1 − ϕ(x 2 )) u(x 1 ,x 2 )

                           for some power series ϕ(x 2 ) and invertible power series u(x 1 ,x 2 ). To simplify no-
                                                      ¯
                           tation we write u = u(x 1 ,x 2 ) ∈ k[[x 1 ,x 2 ]].
                              The Jacobian ideal J g is generated by the three partial derivatives:
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68