Page 60 - Geometric Modeling and Algebraic Geometry
P. 60

4 Monoid Hypersurfaces  57
                              The set of lines through O form a P n−1 . For every a =(a 1 : ··· : a n ) ∈ P n−1 ,
                           the line
                                            L a := {(s : ta 1 : ... : ta n )|(s : t) ∈ P }  (4.1)
                                                                           1
                           intersects X = Z(F) with multiplicity at least d − 1 in O.If f d−1 (a)  =0 or
                           f d (a)  =0, then the line L a also intersects X in the point
                                        θ F (a)=(f d (a): −f d−1 (a)a 1 : ... : −f d−1 (a)a n ).

                           Hence the natural parameterization is the “inverse” of the projection of X from the
                           point O. Note that θ F maps Z(f d−1 ) \ Z(f d ) to O. The points where the parameter-
                           ization map is not defined are called base points, and these points are precisely the
                           common zeros of f d−1 and f d . Each such point b corresponds to the line L b con-
                           tained in the monoid hypersurface. Additionally, every line of type L b contained in
                           the monoid hypersurface corresponds to a base point.
                              Note that Z(f d−1 ) ⊂ P n−1  is the projective tangent cone to X at O, and that
                           Z(f d ) is the intersection of X with the hyperplane “at infinity” Z(x 0 ).
                              Assume P ∈ X is another singular point on the monoid X. Then the line L
                           through P and O has intersection multiplicity at least d − 1+2 = d +1 with X.
                           Hence, according to Bezout’s theorem, L must be contained in X, so that this is only
                           possible if dim X ≥ 2.
                              By taking the partial derivatives of F we can characterize the singular points of
                           X in terms of f d and f d−1 :
                           Lemma 1. Let ∇ =(  ∂  ,...,  ∂  ) be the gradient operator.
                                                    ∂x n
                                             ∂x 1
                                                                n
                           (i) A point P =(p 0 : p 1 : ··· : p n ) ∈ P is singular on Z(F) if and only if
                               f d−1 (p 1 ,...,p n )=0 and p 0 ∇f d−1 (p 1 ,...,p n )+ ∇f d (p 1 ,...,p n )=0.
                           (ii) All singular points of Z(F) are on lines L a where a is a base point.
                           (iii) Both Z(f d−1 ) and Z(f d ) are singular in a point a ∈ P n−1  if and only if all
                               points on L a are singular on X.
                           (iv) If not all points on L a are singular, then at most one point other than O on L a
                               is singular.
                           Proof. (i) follows directly from taking the derivatives of F = x 0 f d−1 + f d , and (ii)
                           follows from (i) and the fact that F(P)=0 for any singular point P. Furthermore, a
                           point (s : ta 1 : ... : ta n ) on L a is, by (i), singular if and only if
                                    s∇f d−1 (ta)+ ∇f d (ta)= t d−1 (s∇f d−1 (a)+ t∇f d (a)) = 0.

                           This holds for all (s : t) ∈ P if and only if ∇f d−1 (a)= ∇f d (a)=0. This proves
                                                  1
                           (iii). If either ∇f d−1 (a) or ∇f d−1 (a) are nonzero, the equation above has at most
                           one solution (s 0 : t 0 ) ∈ P in addition to t =0, and (iv) follows.
                                                1
                              Note that it is possible to construct monoids where F ∈ k[x 0 ,...,x n ], but where
                           no points of multiplicity d − 1 are k-rational. In that case there must be (at least) two
                           such points, and the line connecting these will be of multiplicity d − 2. Furthermore,
                           the natural parameterization will typically not induce a parameterization of the k-
                           rational points from P n−1 (k).
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65