Page 133 - Geothermal Energy Renewable Energy and The Environment
P. 133

7      Resource Assessments







            Assessing a resource is a fundamental activity that is common to all enterprises in which the amount
            of a commodity must be established for economic, management, or scientific purposes. With respect
            to geothermal resources, the scale at which this effort is carried out can be quite local, such as
            assessing the long-term energy availability from a single hot spring, or it can be extremely broad,
            such as a national resource assessment. Despite these vastly different scales, the methodologies
            employed are surprisingly similar since, in all cases, what is sought is a measure of the amount of
            heat that is accessible, the extent to which it can be economically extracted using available technol-
            ogy, and what its lifetime is. Beyond this similarity, however, important differences exist in how
            the necessary information is collected and how it is processed. This chapter will first consider how
            a local resource is evaluated, and then consider the ensemble of information that is necessary to
            conduct national and international assessments and how those data are processed.

            assessInG a GeoThermal resoUrce

            We will consider here the issues associated with establishing the available heat for applications that
            will either directly use the heat, so called direct use applications (discussed in detail in Chapter 11)
            or will use the heat to generate power (Chapter 9). We will not consider resource assessments for
            ground source heat pump applications (Chapter 10) since the heat available for their deployment
            exists everywhere: The most significant challenge for their economic viability is the local geother-
            mal gradient, drilling costs, and competition with other energy sources and is not directly a function
            of the availability of heat.
              Geothermal resource assessments have been an integral part of developing a geothermal resource
            ever since the industry began producing power. Such an effort is the first step in deciding whether
            investment in a facility is an economically viable undertaking. However, to better understand the
            magnitude of the geothermal resource base and the ability of this energy source to contribute to
            local, regional, or national energy markets, it is necessary to develop a more systematic analysis
            than is usually pursued when considering the development of a single facility.
              In 1979 the United States Geological Survey published its most recent systematic assessment
            of the geothermal resource in the United States (Muffler 1979), which followed the first national
            assessment carried out in 1975 (White and Williams 1975). A new assessment is currently underway
            and should be available by the end of 2010 (Williams et al. 2008b).
              Since publication of the 1979 report, several other assessments have been carried out on a vari-
            ety of scales, most of them regional or state-wide (Gawell 2006; Lovekin 2004; Petty et al. 1992;
            Western Governor’s Association 2006). As summarized by Gawell (2006), different approaches
            and underlying methodologies have given rise to a broad range of results that are not directly
            comparable.  This  diversity  of  results  emphasizes  the  important  fact  that  resource  assessments
            provide results that are sensitive to the methodology and assumptions employed in the analysis.
            As a result, it is entirely possible that different studies will produce widely different estimates of a
            resource, and yet they each may be correct. In the approach we will take here, we will follow the
            methodology that was developed by Muffler and Cataldi (1978), Nathenson (1975),  and, White and
            Williams (1975), employed by Muffler in his 1979 assessment, and modified by Williams, Reed,
            and Mariner (2008a).





                                                                                        119
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138