Page 244 - Geothermal Energy Renewable Energy and The Environment
P. 244

Use of Geothermal Resources: Environmental Considerations                   233


            where P  is the pore pressure. The line labeled as P = pore pressure defines the stress condition
                   p
            required for failure of unfractured rock in which the pore pressure is equivalent to the hydrostatic
            pressure.
              Pore water also affects frictional strength through chemical mechanisms. At the molecular level,
            ionic interactions between polar water molecules and the mineral framework, as well as interac-
            tions between certain solute species (such as acids) and the crystal lattice, result in relatively rapid
            rearrangement of bonds. This can weaken the rock at fracture tips, allowing crack growth at stress
            values below those that would otherwise be necessary for a fracture to propagate.
              The curves in Figure 12.3 are specific to the rock that was studied (granite) and the stress condi-
            tions (vertical maximum principal stress). Other rock types, or granites in different settings with
            different geological histories will have curves that are different from those depicted. Nevertheless,
            the relationship to stress and the relative locations of the curves will be similar for all rocks.
              The general nature of these relationships provides insight into the factors that determine the condi-
            tions under which failure of an intact rock, or of a fault or fracture may occur. Specifically, it is obvi-
            ous that the large number of variables that influence failure (fracture and fault orientation, fracture
            and fault properties such as frictional strength, pore pressure, stress), and the  difficulty of obtaining
            detailed descriptions of these variables several kilometers in the subsurface precludes the ability to
            precisely predict the conditions under which failure, and hence seismic activity will occur.
              Predicting the magnitude and manner of the energy release, and hence whether or not a felt
            seismic event will occur, is just as problematic. The energy release and the nature of the movement
            associated with rock failure is a direct function of the size of the area over which a fracture or fault
            slips. This is a reasonably intuitive relationship—if the unfractured rock in Figure 12.3 is subjected
            to a stress of 300 MPa while it is under pressure equivalent to a depth of 2 kilometers, it will fail
            unequivocally. If it fails by forming a set of 1000 fractures, each with 0.1 cm  in surface area with
                                                                          2
            equal movement on each one, the collective movement could amount to a slip of 100 cm and yet the
            sample would exhibit very little movement. If instruments were monitoring the sample, a swarm
            of microseismic events would be detected. If, on the other hand, only one fracture formed, but the
            same total movement had to be accommodated, which is a slip of 100 cm, a much more obvious
            seismic event would be recorded.
              A conclusion that implicitly develops from this discussion of the mechanics of rock failure is
            that it will be difficult to precisely predict where and when seismic activity will occur and what its
            magnitude will be. However, several factors specific to geothermal projects allow forecasts to be
            made with some confidence regarding potential seismic activity and risk.


            seismic acTiviTy associaTed wiTh GeoThermal projecTs
            As noted above, seismic activity has been associated with injection of cool water into hot geother-
            mal reservoirs, extraction of fluid from reservoirs, and high-pressure injection of fluid to enhance
            reservoir permeability. With the basic mechanics of rock failure as background, each of these is
            considered in the following discussion.

            seismicity associated with Injection of cool water
            Most minerals respond to heating by expanding. The extent of expansion depends on the mineral
            structure. Laboratory measurements of the change in molar volume as a function of temperature
            allow determination of the volumetric coefficient of thermal expansion, α , which is defined as
                                                                       V
                                             α  V  = (ΔV/V )/ΔT,                      (12.4)
                                                      0

            where ΔV is the change in volume from a reference state, V , over the temperature interval ΔT.
                                                              0
            Table 12.2 lists the volumetric coefficient of thermal expansion for the potassium feldspars sanidine
            and microcline and the sodium feldspars low- and high-albite. These minerals are among the most
   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249