Page 203 - Geothermal Energy Systems Exploration, Development, and Utilization
P. 203

4.4 Investigations Ahead of Stimulation  179




                          Wellbore
                                               Leak off
                                                                                    Fracture
                          Injection  Friction                                       propagation rock
                                                                                    strength
                                                                                    Stress intensity
                                 Elastic opening                                    factor
                                pressure support
                                of fracture walls




                         Figure 4.2  Top view of a fracture propagation due to hydraulic stimulation (Fokker, 2007).
                         of core or cutting material should be performed. This certainly is of particular
                         importance in case the well is to be stimulated chemically.
                           A routine core analysis will provide key rock matrix properties like porosity
                         and permeability to which a wireline analysis can be calibrated. A complementary
                         special core analysis may be performed focussing on thermal properties (thermal
                         conductivity and possibly radiogenic heat production) and fracture mechanical
                         parameters (e.g., fracture toughness).
                           Within the process of planning a hydraulic stimulation treatment, frac modeling
                         is a key step, for example, to understand the ongoing processes as shown in
                         Figure 4.2. The geomechanical parameters most important for these models are
                         the Young’s modulus E, the Poissson ratio ν, the angle of internal friction φ,
                         and the poroelastic constant η; From these the single, most important parameter
                         certainly is Young’s modulus E since it has a nearly direct relationship with the
                         net pressure, fracture geometry, and fracture width. Young’s modulus can easily
                         be measured in the lab, or derived from sonic logs, and it is recommended in
                         case hydraulic stimulation measures are being planned, to take core samples, and
                         conduct triaxial tests in order to determine the elastic parameters Since these
                         parameters may largely vary between the various lithological units over which the
                         hydraulic fracture will grow, they should be determined for each of the main unit
                         ahead of the stimulation, in order to enable the frac treatment to be planned with
                         sufficient accuracy.
                           Every case-specific upfront investigation program will be compiled according to
                         both the stimulation method of choice and the particular local geological conditions.
                         However, in case a chemical stimulation is being envisaged, the program will
                         certainly focus on mineralogical content and potential hydrothermal alterations,
                         where in the case of hydraulic stimulation treatments, the focus will shift toward
                         the lithological characterization and the rock mechanical properties of the matrix
                         material, and a detailed description of the local stress field.
                           A joint interpretation of the structural geological setting, results of an image log
                         analysis (Figure 4.3), wireline, and if applicable, lab-based stress field investigations
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208