Page 161 - Global Political Economy_Understanding The International Economic Order
P. 161

CHAPTER SEVEN
                                   National Systems of Political Economy






                                        ANY PROFESSIONAL economists and scholars of international
                                   M political economy (IPE), including myself, have given insuffi-
                                   cient attention to the importance of domestic economies to the ways
                                   in which the world economy functions. Economists regard national
                                   economies as dimensionless points, while scholars of IPE have fo-
                                   cused almost exclusively on the international political and economic
                                   system. While it was never justifiable to neglect the role of domestic
                                   factors in the study of international political economy, it has become
                                   increasingly obvious that the role of domestic economies and the dif-
                                   ferences among those economies have become significant determi-
                                   nants of international economic affairs. Thus, study of the different
                                   types of national economies or “national systems of political econ-
                                   omy” and their significance for the global economy has become an
                                   important aspect of the study of international political economy. 1
                                     Several developments in the 1980s increased awareness of the im-
                                   portance of the differences among national political economies. The
                                   miserable economic performance of the socialist economies and of
                                   most less developed countries led many observers to appreciate the
                                   superiority of the market system. The extraordinary economic success
                                   of Japan and of the industrializing economies of Pacific Asia prior to
                                   the 1997 financial crisis led revisionist scholars to declare and others
                                   to worry that the capitalist developmental state model provided the
                                   best route to economic success. International economic conflicts in-
                                   tensified and led to charges that one country or another was not
                                   “playing fair,” and the increasing integration of various national
                                   economies with others possessing differing economic structures and
                                   business practices increased awareness of the significance of these dif-

                                    1
                                     The writings on comparative political economy are quite extensive. Examples in-
                                   clude Peter A. Hall, Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in
                                   Britain and France (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986); and Gunter Heiduk,
                                   ed., Technological Competition and Interdependence: The Search for Policy in the
                                   United States, West Germany, and Japan (Seattle: University of Washington Press,
                                   1990). A polemical but interesting work is Michel Albert, Capitalism vs. Capitalism:
                                   How America’s Obsession with Individual Achievement and Short-term Profit Has
                                   Led It to the Brink of Collapse (New York: Four Walls Eight Windows, 1993).
                                   148
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166