Page 60 - Global Political Economy_Understanding The International Economic Order
P. 60

NEO CLASS ICAL C ONCEP T OF AN ECONO MY
                                Neoclassical economics constitutes a systematic examination of
                              economic affairs as they are defined by professional economists. Eco-
                              nomics is a discipline or profession into which its practitioners have
                              been thoroughly socialized. It is the most systematic and rigorous of
                              the social sciences and the necessary starting point for understanding
                              not only the economy but also many other aspects of society. How-
                              ever, economics is only that—a starting point; it is the beginning and
                              not the endof analysis. The systematic approach taken by neoclassi-
                              cal economics provides many advantages but also embodies certain
                              limitations. Social reality, despite the efforts of economic imperialists
                              andmany rational-choice analysts to persuade us to the contrary,
                              cannot be reducedsolely to the prices andquantities of economic
                              science.
                                Modern economics, like physics andthe other hardsciences and
                              unlike the other social sciences (with the possible exception of demog-
                              raphy and certain fields in psychology), had a founder or lawgiver
                              who, in effect, definedthe purposes, parameters, andmethodology of
                              the discipline. The role of the lawgiver in an academic discipline has
                              been well characterizedby Charles Gillispie in his portrayal of Galileo
                              Galilei who founded physics, the first science worthy of the name. As
                              Gillispie described his genius, Galileo earned recognition as the first
                              true physicist and founder of modern physics because he asked the
                              right questions, proposedanswers (hypotheses or theories), andcre-
                              atedan appropriate methodology (experimental techniques) with
                                                          2
                              which to test possible answers. In such other physical sciences as
                              chemistry andbiology, there are other creative geniuses who laidthe
                              foundations of their disciplines.
                                The foundations of a scientific discipline, or any academic disci-
                              pline for that matter, must contain several elements. Each discipline
                              requires a commonly accepteddefinition of the subject andgeneral
                              agreement on the questions that the members of the discipline must
                              attempt to answer. Another component is a generally preferredmeans
                              or methodology; the principal method of economics is methodologi-
                              cal individualism (the rational-actor method), which assumes that ra-
                              tional, self-centered individuals are the basic economic actors. Possi-
                              ble answers, hypotheses, andeventually theories (perhaps laws)
                              satisfy, at least for a time, the questions of interest to the discipline.
                              The questions, methods, andanswers evolve, accumulate, andare dis-
                              carded over time, through open competition among ideas. The win-


                               2
                                Charles Coulston Gillispie, The Edge of Objectivity: An Essay in the History of
                              Scientific Ideas (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960), 7.
                                                                                       47
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65