Page 227 - Global Project Management Handbook
P. 227

11-2            COMPETENCY FACTORS IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
        11-2
                        COMPETENCY FACTORS IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
        integrative functions. The ideal project-oriented organization is considered a flat organiza-
        tion with a specific project management culture (Gareis, 2004). Use of the organization,
        whether a line organization to carry out a business process or a project or program, creates
        competitive advantage. The development from a classic managed organization to a project-
        oriented organization can be considered to be a paradigm shift.
           While traditional human resources management processes and practices (Wright and
        Boswell, 2002) are designed for the classically managed organization—for the organization
        that mass produces routine products or services and where the job requirements are well
        defined and stable (Keegan and Turner, 2003)—the project-oriented company is confronted
        with specific challenges:
        ● Temporarity. Projects and programs are temporary organizations (Turner and
          Müller, 2003; Gareis, 2005). Thus every time a new project or program is started,
          the human resources configuration of the organization must change.
        ● More dynamic. Project-oriented companies have dynamic boundaries and contexts.
          The number and size of the projects performed are constantly changing, permanent and
          temporary resources are employed, and cooperation with clients, partners, and suppliers
          is organized in teams, some of them are virtual (Gareis, 2004). Projects are considered
          as temporary organizations to bring change (Turner and Müller, 2003). Thus projects
          and programs entail greater uncertainty, creating a more dynamic environment with
          more discontinuity.
        ● Project portfolio. At a certain point in time a project-oriented organization holds a project
          portfolio of different internal and external project types (PMI, 2004; Gareis, 2005). This
          means that more or fewer projects and programs are carried out at the same time. A person
          has multiple roles. A person can work on different projects at the same time, maybe even in
          different project roles. In one project, he or she is a project manager; in another project,
          he or she is a project team member. Or a person can carry a role in a project and at the
          same time carry another role in the permanent organization, for example, in the project
          management office. Consequences are challenges in the multiple resource allocation
          (Eskerod, 1998).
        ● Specific project management culture and management paradigm. The ideal project-
          oriented company has a specific project management culture expressed in the empow-
          erment of employees, process orientation and teamwork, continuous and discontinuous
          organizational change, customer orientation, and networking with clients and suppliers

          (Gareis, 2004). Therefore, specific competencies and skills are needed by the project
          management personnel to work together successfully in projects.
           Thus human resource management needs to be designed to meet the needs of the
        project-oriented organization (Huemann et al., 2005). This has not yet been widely acknowl-
        edged, except from the multiproject resource-allocation perspective (Eskerod, 1998;
        Hendriks et al., 1999). While the organizational project management maturity model
        (OPM3), developed by the Project Management Insitute (PMI, 2003), does not consider
        managing project management personnel, the maturity model for the project-oriented
        company (mm-poc) developed by the Projektmanagement Group of the Vienna
        University of Economics and Business Administration does (Gareis, 2004). The mm-poc
        recognizes the importance of personnel management in the project-oriented company as
        one of the dimensions in the spider-web presentation of the model (Fig. 11.1). Based on
        this model, the Projektmanagement Group of the Vienna University of Economics and
        Business Administration has analyzed and benchmarked 60 project-oriented organiza-
        tions from different industries (see Chap. 22).
           In the maturity model for the project-oriented company (mm-poc), the dimension
        “personnel management in the project-oriented company” includes
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232