Page 116 - Global Tectonics
P. 116

THE FRAMEWORK OF PLATE TECTONICS  103



                          150˚  160˚      170˚     180˚     190˚     200˚     210˚
                                     Western Aleutians


                         50˚


                                              64.7 ( Suiko )

                                              56.2 ( Nintoku )
                         40˚
                                               48.1 ( Koko )

                                               42.4 ( Daikakuji )
                                                   38.7 ( Abbott )
                         30˚                             27.7 ( Midway )
                                                                 10.3 ( Necker )
                               A31                                    7.2 ( Nihoa )
                               ( 67.7 )
                                     A27                                2.6 ( Koolau )
                                    ( 61.1 )  A25
                                         ( 56.1 ) A20  A13               1.03 ( Kahoolawe )
                         20˚                 ( 42.5 )  ( 33.5 )  A6  A5      0
                                                            ( 20.1 ) ( 10.9 )


            Figure 5.10  Predicted Hawaiian hotspot track (solid line) from plate reconstructions assuming that the Indo-Atlantic
            hotspots are fixed. Ages in Ma (redrawn from Steinberger & O’Connell, 2000, by permission of the American Geophysical

            Union. Copyright © 2000 American Geophysical Union).


            implies that its position is not fixed relative to the   approximately 60 Ma, was a result of rifting of litho-

            other major hotspots in the Indo-Atlantic domain.   sphere that had already been thinned by its proximity
            However one can use the absolute motions derived   to a hotspot, rather than the arrival of a plume head.
            from the other hotspots (Müller et al., 1993) to predict   In contrast to this interpretation, however, there is
            the track of the Iceland hotspot on the assumption   considerable doubt, on the basis of geochemical and

            that it is fixed in relation to this frame of reference.   geophysical data, that the Iceland hotspot is fed by a
            Such an analysis has been conducted by Lawver &   deep mantle plume (Section 12.10). The Iceland
            Müller (1994) with intriguing results (Fig. 5.11). The   hotspot is therefore something of an enigma.
            track can be projected back to 130 Ma, at which time
            the hotspot would have been beneath the northern
            margin of Ellesmere Island in the Canadian Arctic.
            Lawver & Müller (1994) suggest that such a track  5.6 TRUE POLAR
            might explain the formation of the Mendeleyev and
            Alpha Ridges in the Canadian Basin of the Arctic  WANDER
            Ocean and the mid-Cretaceous volcanic rocks of Axel
            Heiberg Island and northern Ellesmere Island. At
            60 Ma the hotspot is predicted to have been beneath   In Section 3.6 it was demonstrated that paleomagnetic
            West Greenland where there are volcanics of this age,   techniques can be used to construct apparent polar
            for example on Disko Island. At 40 Ma it would have   wandering paths which track the motions of plates with
            been beneath East Greenland which may explain the   respect to the magnetic north pole and hence, using an
            anomalous post-drift uplift of this area. On this model   axial geocentric dipole model, the spin axis of the Earth.
            the North Atlantic igneous province, initiated at   In Section 5.5 it was suggested that hotspots are nearly
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121