Page 119 - Global Tectonics
P. 119

106   CHAPTER 5



             The relative motion between the mantle and the   erate size and can be considered to form part of the
           rotation axis, as illustrated by the TPW path, may be   normal mantle convecting system. It has been pro-
           interpreted as a shifting of the whole or part of the   posed, however, that at least once during the history of
           Earth in response to some form of internal mass   the Earth there has been an episode of much more
           redistribution that causes a change in the direction   intense volcanic activity. The cause has been ascribed to
           about which the moment of inertia of the mantle is   a phenomena termed superplumes, large streams of
           a maximum (Andrews, 1985). For example, Anderson   overheated material rising buoyantly from the D″ layer
           (1982) relates TPW to the development of elevations of   at the base of the mantle (Section 2.8.6), that derived
           the Earth’s surface resulting from the insulating effect   their heat from the core. These spread laterally at the
           of supercontinents that prevents heat loss from the   base of the lithosphere to affect an area ten times larger
           underlying mantle. It is possible that only the litho-  than more normal plume activity.
           sphere or the mantle or both lithosphere and mantle   Larson (1991a, 1991b, 1995) proposed that a super-
           together shift during polar wander. It is highly unlikely   plume was responsible for the widespread volcanic and
           that the lithosphere and mantle are suffi ciently decou-  intrusive igneous activity that affected abnormally large

           pled to move independently, and so it appears probable   amounts of ocean floor during the mid-Cretaceous.
           that shifting of lithosphere and mantle as a single unit   One manifestation of this activity was the creation of
           takes place during TPW. Indeed, if there is coupling   numerous seamounts and ocean plateaux in the western

           between core and mantle, the whole Earth may be   Pacific (Fig. 7.15) at a rate some five times greater

           affected. Andrews’s interpretation of TPW is supported   during this period than at other times. Similarly there
           by astronomical data which shows that during the 20th   were extrusions of thick, areally extensive fl ood basalts
           century the location of the Earth’s rotational axis has   on the continents, such as the Paraná Basalts of
           moved at a rate similar to that computed from paleo-  Brazil.
                                              −1
           magnetic and hotspot data, namely about 1° Ma . This   Phenomena attributed to the mid-Cretaceous super-
           suggests that at least part of the mass redistribution   plume episode are illustrated in Fig. 5.13. At 120–125 Ma
           takes place in the mantle, as the continents do not move   the rate of formation of oceanic crust doubled over a
           this rapidly. Sabadini & Yuen (1989) have shown that   period of 5 Ma, decreased within the next 40–50 Ma, and
           both viscosity and chemical stratification in the mantle   returned to previous levels about 80 Ma ago (Fig. 5.13d).

           are important in determining the rate of polar wander.   The additional production of crust required increased
           Another mechanism proposed for driving TPW is the   subduction rates, and it is significant that major batho-

           surface mass redistribution arising from major glacia-  liths of the Andes and the Sierra Nevada were emplaced
           tions and deglaciations (Sabadini et al., 1982). However,   at this time.

           mantle flow is required to explain TPW during periods   Coupled to the increased crust production, and
           with no evidence of significant continental glaciation,   caused by the consequent general rise in the level of the


           and, indeed, may be responsible for the majority of   sea floor, was a worldwide increase in sea level to an
           TPW. It has also been suggested that TPW is excited by   elevation some 250 m higher than at the present day
           the mass redistributions associated with subduction   (Fig. 5.13b). At high latitudes the surface temperature
           zones (Section 12.9) (Spada et al., 1992), mountain build-  of the Earth increased by about 10°C, as shown by
           ing, and erosion (Vermeersen & Vlaar, 1993).  oxygen isotope measurements made on benthic fora-

                                                        minifera from the North Pacific (Fig. 5.13a). This effect
                                                        was probably caused by the release of large amounts of
           5.7 CRETACEOUS                               carbon dioxide during the volcanic eruptions, which
                                                        created an enhanced “greenhouse” effect (Sections 13.1.1,
           SUPERPLUME                                   13.1.2). During the superplume episode the rates of
                                                        carbon and carbonate sequestration in organisms
                                                        increased due to the greater area of shallow seas and
                                                        the increased temperature, which caused plankton to
           Certain hotspots, as described in Section 5.5, are thought   thrive. This is reflected in the presence of extensive

           to be the surface manifestation of plumes of hot mate-  black shale deposits at this time (Force, 1984) and in the
           rial ascending from the deep mantle. These are of mod-  estimated oil reserves of this period (Tissot, 1979;
   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124