Page 274 - Global Tectonics
P. 274

SUBDUCTION ZONES  259



                                                         progressively greater from west to east. The angle of
                                                         underthrusting is very shallow in this region. The prob-
                                                         able cause of this seismic gap and shallow underthrust-
                                                         ing is the presence of copious quantities of terrigenous
                                                         sediments within the trench that become increasingly
                                                         abundant towards that section of the trench adjacent to
                                                         Alaska. The unconsolidated nature of these sediments
                                                         probably prevents any build-up of the strain energy
                                                         necessary to initiate earthquakes, and their high positive
            Figure 9.14  A model of stress distributions in the   buoyancy may force the subducting plate to descend at
            descending lithosphere. Solid circles, extensional stress   an anomalously shallow angle.
            down dip; open circles, compressional stress down dip   In reviewing the data for numerous subduction
            (redrawn from Isacks & Molnar, 1969, with permission   zones, Fukao  et al. (2001) noted that subducted slabs
            from Nature 223, 1121–4. Copyright © 1969 Macmillan   are either defl ected horizontally within or just beneath
            Publishers Ltd).
                                                         the transition zone, or penetrate the 660 km disconti-
                                                         nuity and descend into the lower mantle (Plate 9.2
                                                         between pp. 244 and 245). Beneath Chile, the Aleu-
            into either down-dip compression or extension. Isacks   tians, southern Kurile, and Izu-Bonin the slabs appear
            & Molnar (1969) have suggested that the distribution   to flatten out within the transition zone, whereas

            of stress type in the seismic zone may result from the   beneath the Aegean, central Japan, Indonesia, and
            degree of resistance experienced by the plate during   Central America they penetrate deep into the lower
            its descent, and Spence (1987) has described this resis-  mantle. The slab beneath Tonga both fl attens  out
            tance in terms of the net effect of ridge push and slab   within the transition zone and extends into the lower
            pull forces (Section 12.6). In Fig. 9.14a the plate is   mantle (van der Hilst, 1995) (Plate 9.2e between pp.
            sinking through the asthenosphere because of its neg-  244 and 245). There is no relationship between the age
            ative buoyancy and is thrown into down-dip tension as   of a subducting slab and penetration into the lower
            its descent is unimpeded. In Fig. 9.14b the bottom of   mantle. Some researchers maintain that in places there
            the plate approaches the mesosphere, which resists   is evidence for the slabs descending throughout the
            descent and throws the leading tip into compression.   lower mantle to the core–mantle boundary (Section
            As the plate sinks further (Fig. 9.14c), the mesosphere   12.8.2); others consider that there is little evidence for
            prevents further descent and supports the lower margin   slab penetration beneath 1700 km depth (Kárason &
            of the plate so that the majority of the seismic zone   van der Hilst, 2000). The possible implications of these
            experiences compression. In Fig. 9.14d a section of the   tomographic results for convection in the mantle are
            downgoing slab has decoupled so that the upper   considered in Section 12.9.
            portion of the plate is thrown into tension and the
            lower portion into compression. A global summary of
            the stress directions determined from focal mechanism
            solutions (Isacks & Molnar, 1971) is shown in   9.5 THERMAL
            Fig. 9.15.
            vide a possible explanation for the seismic gaps observed  STRUCTURE OF THE
               The stress distributions shown in Fig. 9.14b,d pro-
            along the middle parts of the Benioff zone at certain
            trenches, such as the Peru–Chile Trench (Figs 9.15),  DOWNGOING SLAB
            where it is known that the slab is continuous (James &
            Snoke, 1990). A further type of seismic gap appears to
            be present in some island arcs at shallow depths. Figure   The strength and high negative buoyancy of subducting
            9.16 shows sections through the Benioff zone at the   oceanic lithosphere and its capacity for sudden failure
            Aleutian–Alaska arc (Jacob et al., 1977). There is a prom-  in the generation of earthquakes are consequences of
            inent gap in seismicity between the trench and a point   its relatively low temperature with respect to normal
            about halfway towards the volcanic arc that becomes   mantle material at these depths. The subducting
   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279