Page 297 - Global Tectonics
P. 297

282   CHAPTER 9



           patterns. Geochemical studies also indicate that   underthrusting slab (Hsui & Toksöz, 1981; Jurdy &
           backarc lavas commonly display greater compositional   Stefanick, 1983) or an increase in the angle of subduc-
           variations, including higher water contents, than mid-  tion with depth (Section 12.6). Although these and
           ocean ridge basalts (Taylor & Martínez, 2003). Many   other mechanisms controlling the evolution of backarc
           backarc lavas are chemically related to the lavas that   basins are often debated, most authors agree that basin

           form the adjacent island arc. These observations suggest   evolution is strongly influenced by the pattern of fl ow,
           that crustal accretion in backarc basins is strongly infl u-  partial melting and melt transport in the upper mantle
           enced by processes related to subduction (e.g. Kitada   wedge above a subduction zone. Geodynamic models
           et al., 2006).                               increasingly have appealed to three-dimensional circula-
             Tomographic images of the mantle beneath active   tion patterns associated with trench migration and slab

           backarc spreading centers have confirmed the impor-  roll-back to explain the thermal evolution of the wedge
           tant linkages that exist between backarc crustal accre-  and the production of melt within it (Kincaid & Griffi ths,
           tion and subduction. In one of the best-studied   2003; Wiens & Smith, 2003).
           arc–backarc systems, Zhao  et al. (1997) showed that   Martínez & Taylor (2002) developed a model of
           very slow seismic velocities beneath the active Lau   crustal accretion for the Lau basin that explains the
           spreading center and moderately slow anomalies under   mechanism of backarc magmatism and its relationship
           the Tonga arc are separated at shallow (<100 km) depths   to magmatism in the Tonga arc. These authors observed
           in the mantle wedge but merge below 100 km to depths   that the various spreading centers in the basin (Fig. 9.32)
           of 400 km (Plate 9.1 between pp. 244 and 245). The   display structural and compositional patterns that
           magnitude of the velocity anomalies is consistent with   correlate with distance from the arc. As in most other
           the presence of approximately 1% melt at depths of   intra-oceanic arc systems, the crust displays a general
           30–90 km (Wiens & Smith, 2003). At greater depths the   depletion of certain elements relative to mid-ocean
           anomalies may result from the release of volatiles orig-  ridge basalt that increases from the backarc toward the
           inating from the dehydration of hydrous minerals.   arc. In addition, the spreading center closest to the arc
           These results indicate that backarc spreading is related   (the Valu Fa spreading ridge) displays a structure, depth
           to convective circulation in the mantle wedge and dehy-  and morphology indicating that it is characterized
           dration reactions in the subducting slab. They also   by an enhanced magma supply relative to other
           suggest that backarc magma production is separated   centers. Farther away from the arc, the East Lau and
           from the island arc source region within the depth   Central Lau spreading centers display diminished and
           range of primary magma production. By contrast,   normal magma supplies, respectively. Martínez &
           below 100 km, backarc magmas originate through   Taylor (2002) proposed that these variations result from
           mixing with components derived from slab dehydration   the migration of magma source regions supplying the
           and may help to explain some of the unique features   backarc spreading centers through the upper mantle
           in the petrology of backarc magmas relative to typical   wedge.
           mid-ocean ridge basalts.                       The model of Martínez & Taylor (2002) begins with

             A wide variety of mechanisms has been postulated   the roll-back of the Pacific slab beneath the Tonga
           to explain the formation of backarc basins. One   trench (large white arrow in Fig. 9.33a). This motion

           common view is that the extension and crustal accre-  induces a compensating flow of mantle material beneath
           tion that characterize these environments occur in   the Lau basin (small black arrows). As the mantle
           response to regional tensional stresses in the overriding   encounters water that is released from the subducting
           lithosphere of the subduction zone (Packham & Falvey,   slab (Section 9.8), it partially melts, leaving a residual
           1971). These stresses may result from the trench suction   mantle depleted of a certain melt fraction. The stipple
           force as the subducting slab steepens or “rolls-back”   in Fig. 9.33a indicates the region of hydrated mantle.
           beneath the trench (Chase, 1978; Fein & Jurdy, 1986)   The region of partial melt is shown as the white back-
           (Section 12.6). Such a roll-back mechanism has been pos-  ground beneath the stippling. Flow induced by subduc-
           tulated to occur in subduction systems where the “abso-  tion drives the depleted layer toward the upper corner
           lute” direction of movement of the overriding plate is   of the wedge where increased water concentrations
           away from the trench (e.g. Figs. 10.9b,c, 10.37). Other   from the slab promote additional melting. This region
           sources of the tension could include convection in the   of enhanced melting (outlined area in Fig. 9.33a) sup-
           upper mantle wedge induced by the descent of the   plies the Valu Fa spreading ridge close to the volcanic
   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302